Effects of Working from Home on Musculoskeletal Pain and Coronaphobia during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Castelo, L. A.; Junior, N. C.; Civile, V. T.; Costa, J. M.; Matos, R. R.; Trevisani, V. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic impacted the physical and mental health of Brazilian workers, especially those who started acting in home-office. Changes in the workplace, increased physical inactivity and fear of contracting the disease, known as coronophobia, may be related to increased musculoskeletal pain. ObjectiveTo analyze the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and coronophobia in home-office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as evaluating the relationship between these variables. MethodA cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study with 736 participants was conducted through online questionnaire. Sociodemographic data, working conditions, pain, besides the evaluation of coronophobia using COVID-19 Phobia scale (C19P-S) and pain with the Nordic questionnaire of osteomuscular symptoms (NMQ) were collected. ResultsMost participants were female (78%), with an average age of 32.8 {+/-} 10.7 years. During the pandemic, 71% reported some osteomuscular symptoms, and of these, 64% began to have new paintings of pain in the pandemic, with higher incidence in the lower back and neck. Participants who began to perform their functions in home-office presented a higher incidence of pain and, among them, 53% reported that the furniture was not suitable for homework. Most had little fear of Covid-19, but moderate levels of coronophobia increased the chance of musculoskeletal pain (RP=1,74; IC 95%). There was a significant association between coronophobia and musculoskeletal pain. ConclusionsThe pandemic raised the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain, especially in cervical and lumba regions, and the fear of Covid-19 influenced this relationship.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between telecommuting environment and low back pain among Japanese telecommuting workers: A cross-sectional study 97%
- Association between the physical work environment and work functioning impairment while working from home under the COVID-19 pandemic in Japanese workers 96%
- The managerial role and psychosocial factors of job satisfaction: a cross-sectional study among Wittyfit’s users 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index 95%
- Cognitive Costs and Gait Parameters During Single- and Dual-Task Conditions: A Comparative Study in Individuals With and Without Non-Specific Neck Pain 94%
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and associated occupational factors for low back pain among the bank employees in Dhaka City 96%
- A Cross-sectional Study on Perceived Workplace Health Support and Health-Related Quality of Life 95%
- Workplace Infection Prevention Control Measures and Work Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic among Japanese Workers: A Prospective Cohort Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of working from home on the association between job demands and psychological distress 93%
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among healthcare workers in general hospitals and clinics in Japan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol and Rationale of “The UP Project”: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Active Breaks on Health Indicators in Desk-Based Workers 95%
- Protocol of a Study to Benchmark Occupational Health and Safety in Japan: W2S-Ohpm Study 94%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.