Back

Effects of Working from Home on Musculoskeletal Pain and Coronaphobia during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Castelo, L. A.; Junior, N. C.; Civile, V. T.; Costa, J. M.; Matos, R. R.; Trevisani, V. F.

2025-09-17 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.09.16.25335923
Show abstract

BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic impacted the physical and mental health of Brazilian workers, especially those who started acting in home-office. Changes in the workplace, increased physical inactivity and fear of contracting the disease, known as coronophobia, may be related to increased musculoskeletal pain. ObjectiveTo analyze the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and coronophobia in home-office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as evaluating the relationship between these variables. MethodA cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study with 736 participants was conducted through online questionnaire. Sociodemographic data, working conditions, pain, besides the evaluation of coronophobia using COVID-19 Phobia scale (C19P-S) and pain with the Nordic questionnaire of osteomuscular symptoms (NMQ) were collected. ResultsMost participants were female (78%), with an average age of 32.8 {+/-} 10.7 years. During the pandemic, 71% reported some osteomuscular symptoms, and of these, 64% began to have new paintings of pain in the pandemic, with higher incidence in the lower back and neck. Participants who began to perform their functions in home-office presented a higher incidence of pain and, among them, 53% reported that the furniture was not suitable for homework. Most had little fear of Covid-19, but moderate levels of coronophobia increased the chance of musculoskeletal pain (RP=1,74; IC 95%). There was a significant association between coronophobia and musculoskeletal pain. ConclusionsThe pandemic raised the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain, especially in cervical and lumba regions, and the fear of Covid-19 influenced this relationship.

Matching journals

1
Journal of Occupational Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
#1
458× avg
2
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
#1
304× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 24%
17.7%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 0.5%
15× avg
5
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.2%
91× avg
6
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 30%
2.9%
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 56%
2.8%
8
Archives of Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.3%
26× avg
9
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 15%
1.8× avg
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 5%
5.5× avg
11
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 11%
2.2× avg
12
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
13
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 5%
4.0× avg
14
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 8%
2.4× avg
15
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 22%
0.5%
16
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
BMJ · based on 32 published papers
Top 5%
3.1× avg