Back

Electronic health record mining reveals effects of patient immune status on clinical outcomes of biomaterial implantation following skeletal muscle damage

Sharma, S.; Horton, I.; Josyula, A.; Sadtler, K.

2025-09-18 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.09.16.25335883 medRxiv
Show abstract

Implantation of medical devices and biomaterials can help restore form and function of missing or damaged tissue. It is known that the immune system plays a critical role in both positive and negative outcomes of these implanted materials. The foreign body response is characterized by protein deposition and clotting followed by macrophage inflammation, frustrated phagocytosis, giant cell formation, and ultimately fibrosis. This can inhibit the function of implanted devices (e.g. Insulin pumps) as well as cosmesis (e.g. capsular contracture in breast implants) and persistent inflammation has been associated with more severe outcomes in some patients, including emergence of autoimmune-like pathologies. On the other hand, the immune system plays a constructive role in tissue remodeling and regeneration and is needed for the positive effects of some biomaterials, such as extracellular matrix-based scaffolds in muscle repair. Given these factors, we sought to understand potential variations in post-operative complications in individuals with primary and secondary immune disorders - both autoimmune and immunodeficiencies. This preliminary observational study using electronic health record mining showed increased complication odds for individuals with both autoimmune conditions and immunodeficiencies, with variations dependent upon the individuals sex and age as well as the type of material implanted. Future prospective studies could yield improved insight into both mechanisms of immune response to materials in humans and identify potential risk factors for individual patients undergoing plastics and reconstructive surgeries.

Published in Biomaterials Science (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.9%
Biomaterials Science · published here
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.3%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
10
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
18
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Journal of General Physiology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
23
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%