Navigating a fragmented care system: a qualitative study exploring the combined perspectives of critical care survivors and their clinicians.
Nazeer, S.; Mathieson, G.; puthucheary, z.; STEPHENS, T.
Show abstract
Recovery following a critical illness is challenging. Follow-up clinic provision is standard of care, but the effectiveness of services remain unclear, with some data demonstrating limited or potential detrimental effects. While the patients perspective has been described previously, no studies combine with clinician experience. We explored the experiences of patients and clinicians to understand modifiable factors in delivering effective post-critical care recovery services. A single-centre qualitative study was conducted as part of an evaluation of a new care navigator service. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and clinicians, and themes identified. Sixteen patients and seven clinicians were interviewed. Emergent themes highlighted challenges in coordination between hospital, community and social care teams. Fragmented care was a significant barrier to recovery, resulting in frustration. Clinicians recognised the heterogenous nature of recovery and emphasised the need for patients to receive better support navigating the recovery process. Our data highlight the importance of integrated follow-up care for critical illness survivors and the need for clinicians to act as navigators within fragmented care systems. Systemic improvements in follow-up care are required, as is the integration of social and healthcare services to ensure that patients receive timely and comprehensive support.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
- Bereavement care for ethnic minority communities: A systematic review of access to, models of, outcomes from, and satisfaction with, service provision 96%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 97%
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 95%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 92%
- Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: Findings from a UK-wide survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neonatal outcomes of preterm infants born during COVID-19 community lockdowns in Melbourne, Australia 87%
- Different features of cholera in malnourished and non-malnourised children: analysis of 10-year surveillance data from a large diarrheal disease hospital in urban Bangladesh 85%
- Knowledge and aptitude of early childhood, primary and/or secondary education teachers referred to first aid measures in dental trauma in the province of Seville (Spain.) 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.