Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the Familia Bora parenting program for couples with young children in Mwanza, Tanzania: a pilot mixed-methods process evaluation
Jeong, J.; Lambert, V. J.; Wolfram, C.; Uyehara, M.; Sangarara, G.; Joseph, J.; Louttit, M.; McCann, J.; Joachim, D.
Show abstract
Through a research-practice partnership with collaborators and community members in Tanzania, we co-designed Familia Bora, a 17-session father-inclusive parenting intervention delivered weekly to couples in mixed-gender groups to promote responsive caregiving, couples relationships, caregiver mental health, and gender equity and holistically improve early child development. From July to November 2024, we piloted Familia Bora and conducted a mixed-methods process evaluation to assess its feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, and to identify opportunities for strengthening program delivery and implementation. Sixty-two couples with a child under 2 years were enrolled into the program across six communities in Ilemela District, Mwanza, Tanzania, from July to November 2024. Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness were assessed using multiple data sources: 90 session attendance records, 75 structured session observations, 79 facilitator feedback forms, 167 participant exit interviews (68 mothers and 99 fathers), endline surveys with 58 fathers, and 37 qualitative interviews at midline and 47 at endline with a purposively selected subsample of mothers, fathers, and group leaders. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Findings were triangulated across data sources to provide a comprehensive assessment of program implementation across multiple dimensions. We found that the program was feasible to deliver and highly acceptable to both fathers and mothers. Attendance rates were satisfactory among both mothers and fathers. The majority of participants rated the program positively, highlighting its content relevance, cultural appropriateness, and perceived benefits. Sessions on responsive caregiving, economic strengthening, and mental health were rated most favorably, whereas topics like non-violent discipline and fathers engagement in household chores met some initial resistance due to gender and cultural norms. Parents valued the mixed-gender group format, interactive materials, and participatory delivery, noting that these aspects fostered learning, reflection, and message sharing within their communities. Transport reimbursements were also valued by participants and identified as a key facilitator of attendance. Overall, this pilot evaluation demonstrates that Familia Bora was feasible, highly acceptable, and well received by both mothers and fathers. Findings highlight the promise of co-designed, gender-transformative, couples-based parenting programs for reducing barriers, promoting equitable caregiving, and fostering supportive caregiving environments for early child development. These findings support further testing of this program through a larger implementation study in Tanzania and potentially other similar contexts.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 96%
- Community-orientated primary health care: exploring the interface between community health worker programmes, the health system and communities in South Africa 95%
- “I can be a source of motivation”: Perspectives from stakeholders of the I’mPossible fellowship, a peer-led differentiated service delivery model for adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV in India 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a context-relevant psychosocial stimulation intervention to promote cognitive development of children with severe acute malnutrition in Mwanza, Tanzania 96%
- Caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of the Smart Discharges Program for children with sepsis in Uganda: A descriptive qualitative study 96%
- Sexual health knowledge acquisition processes among very young adolescent girls in rural Malawi: Implications for sexual and reproductive health programs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 94%
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 93%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 94%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 94%
- “My friends would believe my word”: appropriateness and acceptability of respondent-driven sampling in recruiting young tertiary student men who have sex with men for HIV/STI research in Nairobi, Kenya 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.