Back

MOAST: Mechanism of Action Similarity Tool

Lohith, A.; Terciano, D.; Murray, A.; MacMillan, J.; Lokey, S.

2025-09-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.09.15.676411 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining the mechanism of action (MOA) for natural products remains a significant bottleneck in drug discovery, particularly for researchers with limited computational resources or small compound libraries. Traditional approaches require screening large numbers of annotated compounds alongside unknowns, which is cost-prohibitive, or depend on complex machine learning models that need substantial computational resources and large datasets. Here, we present a dissertation chapter excerpt: MOAST (Mechanism of Action Similarity Tool), a BLAST-inspired computational workflow that addresses these limitations by providing rapid MOA hypotheses for newly screened compounds. This chapter investigates two complementary approaches: a kernel density estimation (KDE) method providing statistical significance measures and E-values for MOA class membership, and a CatBoost machine learning classifier for multi-class prediction with ranked outputs. Using cytological profiling data from HeLa and A549 cell lines, MOAST achieved 22% accuracy for the top 5 predictions among [~] 300 MOA classes, with the CatBoost classifier reaching 10% balanced accuracy--significantly better than the [~] 3% reported in literature. The tool suggests a 0.8 prediction probability threshold for trustworthy results and demonstrates robust performance across multiple feature reduction strategies. MOAST provides a practical, accessible solution that bridges traditional phenotypic screening and modern computational approaches, making MOA determination feasible for researchers with limited resources while maintaining statistical rigor and interpretability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.4%
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
7
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
10
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
17
Nature Protocols
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
20
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
23
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%