Back

How do visual and conceptual factors predict the composition of typical scene drawings?

Wang, G.; Duymaz, I.; Foxwell, M.; Engeser, M.; Pitcher, D.; Cichy, R. M.; Kaiser, D.

2025-09-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.15.676247 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Imagine you are asked to draw a typical bedroom, what would you put on paper? Your choice of objects is likely to depend on visual occurrence statistics (i.e., the objects present in previously encountered bedrooms) and semantic relations between objects and scenes (i.e., the semantic relationship between the bedroom and its constituent objects). To investigate how these two factors contribute to the composition of typical scene drawings, we analyzed 1,192 drawings of six indoor scene categories, obtained from 303 participants. For each object featured in the drawings, we estimated its visual occurrence frequency from the ADE20K dataset of annotated scene images, and its semantic relatedness to the scene concept from a word2vec language processing model. Across all scenes of a given category, generalized linear models revealed that visual and conceptual factors both predicted the likelihood of an object featuring in the scene drawings, with a combined model outperforming both single-factor models. We further computed the visual and semantic specificity of objects for a given scene, that is, how diagnostic an object is for the scene. Object specificity offered only weak predictive power when predicting the selection of objects, yet even infrequently drawn objects remained diagnostic of their scenes. Taken together, we show that visual and conceptual factors jointly shape the composition of typical scene drawings. By releasing a large dataset of typical scene drawings alongside this work, we further provide a starting point for future studies exploring other critical properties of human drawings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
4
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
14
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
20
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
25
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%