Back

A novel type of gel-like proteasome condensate induced by toxic protein aggregates

Sirvio, L.; Morten, M. J.; Burridge, M.; Chua, T.; Whitwell, H.; Ye, Y.

2025-09-17 cell biology
10.1101/2025.09.15.676044 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteasomes reversibly form foci bodies in a liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS)-dependent manner upon stress. We previously reported that internalized protein aggregates were targeted by proteasome-dense foci1, and proposed that such transient aggregate-associated droplets (TAADs) may facilitate aggregate removal2. Here we use quantitative imaging to show that TAADs represent a novel type of gel-like proteasome condensate. TAADs are irregular in shape and slow to disperse, sequestering proteasomes in agreement with our observation of confined diffusion3. We demonstrate that TAADs co-localize with cytosolic alpha-synuclein aggregates to facilitate their clearance. Inhibition of proteasome- or ubiquitination activity abolishes this aggregate clearance. We identify RAD23B necessary for TAAD formation, amid other co-localizing chaperones and (co-)proteins of the ubiquitin-proteasomes system. TAAD formation is associated with higher proteasomal substrate turnover whilst retaining overall catalytic efficiency, suggestive of altered degradation mechanisms upon aggregate engagement. Proteomics analysis reveals impact on key mitochondrial-associated processes even after TAAD-aggregate disengagement. Similar TAAD-aggregate co-localizations are found in iPSC-differentiated neurons and in disease-relevant samples, with no detection of compromised proteasome activity. Together, our results indicate a model where TAADs concentrate local proteasome activity, which facilitates aggregate clearance in healthy ageing cells. Potentially, should pathological aggregates persist, TAADs may remain engaged and conceivably sequester proteasomes from physiological activities, thus contributing to neurodegenerative disorders.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.