Use Of Stingless Bee Honey (Meliponinae Subfamily) In Wound Treatment: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
da Silva, D. F.; Ferreira, F. S.; Nascimento, P. C. C.; Assis, A. L. S. d.; de Medeiros, K. S.; Costa, I. K. F.; de Oliveira e Araujo, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionStingless bee honey has been traditionally used in medicinal practices; however, its therapeutic properties have not yet been comprehensively systematized in the scientific literature. Honey produced by meliponine bees exhibits a unique biochemical composition that promotes wound healing, antimicrobial activity, and anti-inflammatory effects, particularly in chronic and hard-to-heal wounds such as those associated with diabetes mellitus--a significant public health challenge. This underscores the need for therapeutic alternatives that are effective, safe, and accessible. ObjectiveTo analyze the effectiveness of stingless bee honey in wound healing. MethodsThis is a systematic review with meta-analysis, to be conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251001075). Eligible studies will include clinical trials and in vivo or in vitro models that assess the use of pure stingless bee honey or its derivatives in wound healing. The intervention will be compared with standard treatments, placebo, or no treatment. Primary outcomes include wound size reduction, granulation tissue formation, and antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The search will be conducted in international databases with no restrictions on language or publication date. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. ConclusionsConsolidating the existing evidence may contribute to a better understanding of the efficacy and safety of stingless bee honey in therapeutic wound care. The findings may support the development of new honey-based products and promote accessible treatment strategies, particularly for chronic wounds in resource-limited settings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
- What are the impacts of oral complications from cancer therapy on the quality of life of children? A protocol to update a scoping review 93%
- One Health, One Hive: A scoping review of honey bees, climate change, pollutants, and antimicrobial resistance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- International Prevalence Of Consultation With A Naturopathic Practitioner: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 91%
- Population-Based Sero-Epidemiological Study Protocol For The Impact Of Smoking On SARS-COV-2 Infection And COVID-19 Outcomes – The Troina Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 93%
- Face mask use in the Community for Reducing the Spread of COVID-19: a systematic review 92%
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of ID NOW and RT-PCR for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an Ambulatory Population 91%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 89%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.