Back

Representativeness of participants in a randomized controlled trial on modalities of monitoring oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use

Groot Bruinderink, M. L.; Schim van der Loeff, M. F.; Dusseldorp, F.; van der Velde, K.; Blitz, L.; Brand, J.-M.; van Bokhoven, C. C. A. J.; Woudstra, J.; Vermey, K.; Boers, S.; Sluimer, M.; Gotz, H. M.; Boyd, A.; Werner, L.; Soors d'Ancona, M.; van Harreveld, F.; Prins, M.; Hoornenborg, E.; Davidovich, U.; Jongen, V.

2025-09-15 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.09.15.25335748 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe assessed whether participants in the EZI-PrEP study, a non-inferiority trial evaluating online and six-monthly monitoring of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), represent the broader population of PrEP users in the Netherlands. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data from September 2021 to August 2022 at four sexual health centres (SHCs) in the Netherlands. Socio-demographic characteristics, sexual behaviour, and prevalence of bacterial STIs were compared between EZI-PrEP participants at baseline and other PrEP users during their first PrEP monitoring visit in said time period. ResultsThe analysis included 469 EZI-PrEP participants and 5196 other PrEP users; respectively 99% and 96% were men who have sex with men (MSM). EZI-PrEP participants were less often transgender or gender divers persons (TGDP) (1% vs. 4%, p<0.001), older (median age=36 vs. 34 years, p=0.004), more often born in the Netherlands (68% vs. 58%, p<0.001), and more often completed a university/college degree (81% vs. 76%, p=0.01). They reported more group sex (38% vs. 33%, p=0.023) and condomless anal sex (95% vs. 92%, p=0.004), but less often sex work (1% vs. 6%, p<0.001). Prevalence of bacterial STIs was similar between groups (19% vs 18%, p=0.766). ConclusionsThe similar STI prevalence suggests comparable risk for HIV acquisition among EZI-PrEP participants and other PrEP users, making EZI-PrEP study outcomes applicable to a broader population of PrEP users. However, under-representation of TGDPs, sex workers, individuals not born in the Netherlands, and individuals without university or college degree may limit generalizability.

Published in AIDS Research and Therapy · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.