D-Cycloserine for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Barroso, J.; Vigotsky, A. D.; Salas, S.; Cong, O.; Simonian, N.; Apkarian, V.; Schnitzer, T. J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveChronic low back pain (cLBP) is a leading cause of global disability, with current treatments offering limited and inconsistent relief. D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial NMDA receptor agonist and FDA-approved antimicrobial, has shown promise in preclinical models for reducing neuropathic pain and its negative emotional impact. Building on these findings and a positive pilot study, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCS in adults with cLBP. MethodsParticipants with cLBP (n=203) were randomized to receive 200 mg DCS or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week placebo phase. The primary outcome was pain intensity (numeric rating scale, NRS) at 12 weeks; secondary outcomes included pain intensity at 24 weeks, safety, and patient-reported psychological measures. ResultsDCS had negligible effects on pain compared to placebo at both 12 weeks (adjusted effect: -0.07/10 NRS units, 95% CI: (-0.67, 0.53), p = 0.78) and at 24 weeks (adjusted effect: -0.22/10 NRS units, 95% CI: (-0.84, 0.40), p = 0.39). Adverse events were similar between groups. Exploratory outcomes also showed no significant effects. ConclusionOur results indicate that 12 weeks of DCS 400 mg/day does not provide clinically meaningful analgesia in cLBP, though it is well tolerated. These findings highlight the challenges of translating preclinical neuropathic pain results to heterogeneous clinical pain populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 96%
- Amygdalar Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Driven Effects of Cold Sensitivity Induced by Peripheral Neuropathy in Mice 94%
- Protease-Activated Receptor 2 (PAR2) expressed in sensory neurons contributes to signs of pain and neuropathy in paclitaxel treated mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Negative Allosteric Modulator Fenobam: Pharmacokinetics, Side Effects, and Analgesic Effects in Healthy Human Subjects. 95%
- Neural effects of placebo analgesia in fibromyalgia patients and healthy individuals 95%
- A randomised controlled trial of the effect of intra-articular lidocaine on pain scores in inflammatory arthritis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabidivarin for the treatment of HIV-associated neuropathic pain: a randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial 95%
- Assessment of the acute effects of 2C-B vs psilocybin on subjective experience, mood and cognition 90%
- DrugWAS: Leveraging drug-wide association studies to facilitate drug repurposing for COVID-19 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 93%
- Interventions to reduce opioid use for patients with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Savor the flavor — a randomized double-blind study on taste-enhanced placebo analgesia in healthy volunteers 94%
- Risk assessment of drug-induced Long QT Syndrome for some COVID-19 repurposed drugs 88%
- Managing Endothelial Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial at the Lebanese American University Medical Center - Rizk Hospital (MEDIC-LAUMCRH) 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.