Back

D-Cycloserine for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Barroso, J.; Vigotsky, A. D.; Salas, S.; Cong, O.; Simonian, N.; Apkarian, V.; Schnitzer, T. J.

2025-09-15 pain medicine
10.1101/2025.09.14.25335705 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveChronic low back pain (cLBP) is a leading cause of global disability, with current treatments offering limited and inconsistent relief. D-cycloserine (DCS), a partial NMDA receptor agonist and FDA-approved antimicrobial, has shown promise in preclinical models for reducing neuropathic pain and its negative emotional impact. Building on these findings and a positive pilot study, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCS in adults with cLBP. MethodsParticipants with cLBP (n=203) were randomized to receive 200 mg DCS or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week placebo phase. The primary outcome was pain intensity (numeric rating scale, NRS) at 12 weeks; secondary outcomes included pain intensity at 24 weeks, safety, and patient-reported psychological measures. ResultsDCS had negligible effects on pain compared to placebo at both 12 weeks (adjusted effect: -0.07/10 NRS units, 95% CI: (-0.67, 0.53), p = 0.78) and at 24 weeks (adjusted effect: -0.22/10 NRS units, 95% CI: (-0.84, 0.40), p = 0.39). Adverse events were similar between groups. Exploratory outcomes also showed no significant effects. ConclusionOur results indicate that 12 weeks of DCS 400 mg/day does not provide clinically meaningful analgesia in cLBP, though it is well tolerated. These findings highlight the challenges of translating preclinical neuropathic pain results to heterogeneous clinical pain populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.