Neural correlates of perceptual biases in duration perception
Shirzhiyan, Z.; Glasauer, S.
Show abstract
How we perceive a current event depends not only on its immediate context, but also on how our internal expectations are shaped by prior experience. In time perception, these expectations manifest as systematic biases, namely sequential dependence, where the current percept is influenced by the previous stimulus, and central tendency, the overestimation of short durations and underestimation of long ones. Both perceptual biases, corresponding to individual beliefs about stimulus generation, can vary substantially between participants. However, the neural correlates of these individual beliefs and their effects are unknown. Here, we investigate how these biases and their individual variations are reflected in neural responses in a duration reproduction task. Our EEG results show that in the frontocentral region, the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) while experiencing the current stimulus depends on the previous stimulus regardless of whether sequential dependence is high or low. In contrast, in the right parietal region, CNV significantly correlated with the amount of sequential dependence. Central tendency was associated with frontocentral CNV amplitude and post-stimulus P2 components. A Bayesian model of time perception reproduced the observed neural dynamics, suggesting that internal estimates and expectations of stimulus offset are reflected in EEG responses. Our results demonstrate that both forms of perceptual bias, sequential dependence and central tendency, are reflected in neural activity while experiencing the ongoing stimulus, suggesting that both biases directly affect the measurement of time. New and NoteworthyIndividuals differ in how they perceive magnitudes, exhibiting systematic biases, sequential dependence and central tendency, which reflect internal expectations about stimulus generation. Using EEG, we show that both behavioral biases are reflected in neural dynamics during stimulus encoding, which can be reproduced by a Bayesian model. The correspondence between perceptual biases and patterns of brain activity indicates that perceptual history and expectations directly influence how the brain measures and represents time.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prestimulus alpha phase modulates visual temporal integration 96%
- Strength of low-frequency EEG phase entrainment to external stimuli is associated with fluctuations in the brain's internal state 95%
- Alpha-band lateralization and microsaccades elicited by exogenous cues do not track attentional orienting 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural precursors of deliberate and arbitrary decisions in the study of voluntary action 96%
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness 96%
- The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.