Distinct Implicit Contributions to Action Selection and Action Execution in Sensorimotor Adaptation
Wang, T.; Lam, T.; Taylor, J. A.; Ivry, R. B.
Show abstract
The sensorimotor system is continuously adjusted to minimize error. Current theories assume that this adaptation process entails the operation of multiple learning systems, with a key division between implicit and explicit components. Recent studies have revealed several inconsistencies regarding the characteristics and constraints of the implicit system, suggesting that the current framework is incomplete. Here, we propose that these conflicting findings can be understood by recognizing that there are multiple implicit subcomponents, distinguished by their distinct computational goals. One well-studied component is implicit recalibration, a process critical for action execution which uses sensory-prediction errors to automatically refine the sensorimotor map. Here we describe a second, novel component, implicit aiming, a process which contributes to action selection to achieve the specific goals. Through a series of studies, we find compelling evidence that those two implicit processes show a clear separation in their temporal stabilities and contextual modulations. These distinct properties correspond to different computational frameworks attributing learning dynamics to either contextual inference or cancellation of competing neural populations, respectively. Together, these findings suggest an alternative framework for sensorimotor adaptation based on the computational goals of the system rather than phenomenology.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- External error attribution dampens efferent-basedpredictions but not proprioceptive changes in handlocalization 96%
- Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaption along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches 96%
- Implicit and explicit learning of Bayesian priors differently impacts bias during perceptual decision-making 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.