Back

Pre- and postnatal 1,4-phenylene di-isothiocyanate treatment does not induce bile duct injury in neonatal pigs

Elefson, S.; Vonderohe, C.; Stoll, B.; Burrin, D.; Guthrie, G.

2025-09-15 pathology
10.1101/2025.09.12.675643 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBiliary atresia (BA) is the leading cause of pediatric liver transplants, however; the cause of biliary atresia (BA) is unknown. Furthermore, the most common treatment for this disease is with a surgical procedure, which has a greater than 50% failure rate after 5 years. Due to a lack of proper animal models to study the pathology of the disease, little progress has been made in the field. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to test whether pre and postnatal 1,4-phenylene di-isothiocyanate (DITC) would induce bile duct injury and cholestasis in neonatal pigs. MethodsPregnant sows received DITC once at gestation week 5 (100 mg/kg; n=2), or 3 times at gestation weeks 5, 6, and 7 (100 mg/kg each; n=2), or twice per week at gestation weeks 5-16 (15 mg/kg each; n=2). Cesarian-delivered piglets of the sows were randomly assigned to receive approximately 200 mg/kg DITC on days two, four, and six of life or to remain untreated. Piglets were fed enterally and collected blood samples were monitored for markers of liver injury for 14 days. At the end of 14 days, tissues were weighed and collected for immunohistochemistry and histopathology scoring. ResultsPiglets from sows that received DITC for 11 weeks had lower (P < 0.05) final body weight and daily gain compared to other treatments. Piglets from sows that received DITC for 11 weeks had a transient increase in gamma-glutamyl transferase. Liver histological scoring and analysis also did not show signs of BA. Piglets that received DITC from 11-week DITC-treated sows had elevated hepatic bile acids (P < 0.05), but there was no difference in serum bile acids (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe administration of DITC to pregnant sows and neonatal piglets did not result in the development of bile duct or hepatic injury.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.5%
2
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.5%
4
Journal of Lipid Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
7
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
15
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%