Influence of Epigenetic Regulators Expression on Gastric Cancer Prognosis
Rotella, L. B.; Khayat, A. S.; Silva, M. F.; Costa, V. P.; Pereira, D.; Moreira, F. C.; Demachki, S.; Casseb, S. M.; Barra, W. F.; Ishak, G.; Burbano, R. M. R.; Assumpcao, P. P.
Show abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. High mortality is largely associated with late diagnosis and tumor heterogeneity, highlighting the need for molecular insights. Epigenetic alterations, including histone modifications and DNA/RNA methylation, play a key role in gene regulation, tumor progression, and therapy response. This study analyzed 179 samples (156 tumor, 23 normal) from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in Para, Brazil (2017 to 2020). RNA was extracted, quality checked, and used for cDNA library preparation (TruSeq, Illumina). Sequencing was performed on NextSeq 500, followed by quality control (FastQC), trimming (Trimmomatic), and quantification (Salmon, hg38/GENCODE v.42). Differential expression was assessed with DESeq2 in R. A panel of 304 epigenetic genes was examined, and expression patterns were visualized through heatmaps and clustering. Among the 304 genes analyzed, 167 (55%) showed differential expression in GC compared with normal tissue. Of these, 17 were related to DNA methylation, 29 to RNA methylation, 34 to histone acetylation, and 87 to histone methylation. Our results demonstrate dysregulation of all epigenetic processes investigated, promoting the activation of oncogenes (DNMT1, MYC, ELF3, HDAC4, and HDAC7) and the silencing of tumor suppressors (CTCF, DNMT3B, ATRX, PRDM16 and MSH6), promoting genomic instability, apoptosis evasion, and tumor progression. No standard activation or repression patterns were found. Distinct and specific tumor profiles highlight the central role of epigenetic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of GC. Furthermore, epigenetic regulators have been shown to be potential biomarkers, prognosticators, and therapeutic targets.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 94%
- Functional signatures in non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex-based differences in transcriptomic studies 94%
- A novel role for the tumor suppressor gene ITF2 in lung tumorigenesis and chemotherapy response 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- TCGA Pan-Cancer genomic analysis of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) related genes 94%
- Molecular pathways associated with Kallikrein 6 overexpression in colorectal cancer 94%
- Structural variability, expression profile and pharmacogenetics properties of TMPRSS2 gene as a potential target for COVID-19 therapy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) analysis of FFPE rectal cancer samples offers in depth proteomics characterization of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 94%
- Unveiling epigenetic regulatory elements associated with breast cancer development 94%
- Regulation Network of Colorectal Cancer Specific Enhancers in Progression of Colorectal Cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome wide DNA methylation profiling identifies specific epigenetic features in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. 94%
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 94%
- P16 methylation increases the sensitivity of cancer cells to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 94%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 93%
- Detection of Somatic Copy Number Deletion of CDKN2A Gene for Clinical Practices Based on Discovery of A Base-Resolution Common Deletion Region 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.