Back

Cerebrovascular Responses to Static and Rhythmic Handgrip Exercises

Allison, E. Y.; Mei, Y.; Ismayilov, H. A.; Coombs, G. B.; Walsh, J. J.; Carter, M. J.; King, T.; Al-Khazraji, B. K.

2025-09-17 physiology
10.1101/2025.09.11.675716 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Handgrip exercise (HGE) is a safe, accessible exercise modality shown to improve cardiovascular health and is particularly promising for individuals with limited mobility who cannot engage in traditional exercise. Given that contraction type and intensity influence systemic cardiorespiratory variables that affect cerebral blood flow regulation, this study examined the acute systemic hemodynamic and cerebrovascular responses to static and rhythmic HGE protocols at varying intensities. Thirty-three healthy young adults (17 males; 16 females age 22(1) years) performed four separate 5-minute HGE protocols in a randomized order: static HGE at 15% (S15) of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), static HGE at 30% MVC, rhythmic HGE at 30% MVC, rhythmic HGE at 60% (R60) MVC. We hypothesized that rhythmic HGE at higher intensities would produce the greatest cerebrovascular responses due to enhanced venous return and cardiac output, while static HGE at higher intensities would elicit the greatest systemic (i.e., blood pressure, HR, ventilation) responses. Cerebral (middle cerebral artery blood velocity [MCAv] and cerebrovascular conductance index [MCACVCi], internal carotid artery [ICA] diameter, velocity, blood flow, and shear rate) and systemic hemodynamics (systolic [SBP], diastolic [DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate [HR], cardiac output [CO]), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) levels were averaged over the final 30s of each minute of exercise. There was a significant time and protocol interaction effect on HR (p<0.001). We found significant main effects of exercise protocol for MCAv (p<0.001), MCACVCi (p<0.001), ICA diameter (p=0.01) and blood flow (p=0.001), and PETCO2 (p=0.002). Greatest increases in MCAv alongside the largest reduction in ICA blood flow occurred in R60. The greatest increase in MCACVCi and ICA blood flow (from baseline) occurred in R30 compared to other protocols. In addition to the greater cerebrovascular responses, we also observed more modest systemic responses (lower HR, MAP, CO) and lower self-reported ratings of perceived exertion (p<0.001) in R30 compared to other protocols. Acute increases in MCACVCi and ICA blood flow observed in R30 (despite the lower perceived effort) may suggest that rhythmic HGE at low-moderate intensities can be a tolerable prescription for inducing exercise-related cerebrovascular adaptations (i.e., improved cerebral perfusion) in populations that may require adapted physical activity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.7%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
7
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
13
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%