Characterizing Simultaneously Recorded Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response Paradigm
Herb, I. N.; Polonenko, M. J.
Show abstract
PurposeThe auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle latency response (MLR) are used to characterize hearing but typically require separate recordings due to differing optimal parameters and setups in clinical systems. Advances such as the parallel ABR (pABR) paradigm now allow simultaneous recording of both responses, enabling more comprehensive assessments. We evaluated this simultaneous recording approach by characterizing responses at near- and suprathreshold levels using parameters optimized for pABR. MethodsThis study used an open dataset [1] of pABR recordings from 20 normal hearing adults to tone-pip stimuli at five frequencies, six presentation rates, and two intensities. ABR (I, III, and V) and MLR (P0, Na, Pa, Nb, Pb) waves were analyzed for presence, latency, and amplitude using linear mixed effect modeling. ResultsAt both levels, ABR wave V and MLR waves Na and Pa were the most consistently identifiable and largest peaks across frequencies, rates, and participants. Frequency and rate changes affected ABR wave V amplitude more than the MLR peaks, whose amplitudes and latencies remained comparatively stable across the moderate and soft levels used in this study. ConclusionABR wave V and MLR waves Na and Pa are robust and consistently identifiable with pABR-optimized parameters. A simultaneous recording approach that leverages visualization of all three components could both assess auditory function across more areas of the auditory system using a moderate suprathreshold level, and support detection/interpretation of smaller wave Vs for threshold estimation, particularly for broader low frequency responses.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors for Estimating Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech 95%
- A pilot Study: Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSR) can be measured in human Fetuses using fetal Magnetoencephalography (fMEG) 93%
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study 96%
- Optimizing auditory brainstem response acquisition using interleaved frequencies 96%
- Predicting cochlear synaptopathy in mice with varying degrees of outer hair cell dysfunction using auditory evoked potentials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech in noise performance in adults with cochlear implants using a combined channel deactivation strategy with a variable number of dynamic focused channels 96%
- ABRpresto: An algorithm for automatic thresholding of the Auditory Brainstem Response using resampled cross-correlation across subaverages 96%
- Brainstem Auditory Physiology in Children with Listening Difficulties 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing parameters for using the parallel auditory brainstem response (pABR) to quickly estimate hearing thresholds 97%
- Relationships between the auditory nerve’s ability to recover from neural adaptation, cortical encoding of and perceptual sensitivity to within-channel temporal gaps in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users 96%
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the Use of Envelope Following Responses to Estimate Peripheral Level Compression in the Auditory System 97%
- An Open-Source Deep Learning-Based Toolbox forAutomated Auditory Brainstem Response Analyses (ABRA) 96%
- EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.