Back

Bigger Is Better Than Many: A Strategy to Optimize Multi-Gene Co-Expression

King, C. R.; Berezin, C.-T.; Sanders, S.; Nowak, M.; Peccoud, J.

2025-09-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.09.11.675629 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large plasmids are often avoided in mammalian co-transfection due to the assumption that they transfect poorly, driving the use of multiple smaller plasmids. Here, we pair finite-state-projection modeling with flow cytometry experiments to compare one-, two-, and three-plasmid delivery of GFP/BFP/RFP. Estimated entry rates were size-independent from 4.9 to 16.4 kb, indicating that plasmid length is not the dominant barrier in this range. Our results suggest that using lipofectamine slightly increases co-transfection efficiency due to the ability of lipoplexes to contain multiple plasmids. However, this benefit is limited to only delivering two plasmids. Additionally, we show that contrary to current beliefs, putting all genes onto the same plasmid both increases the probability that a cell will express all genes of interest and results in a tighter correlation of gene expression levels compared to these multi-plasmid systems. Together, these results identify multi-cargo delivery and not plasmid size as the key constraint on co-transfection and show that single-plasmid designs are generally preferable for applications such as viral-vector production. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/675629v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (26K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@251928org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@196d1cborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a781e9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1420928_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.3%
2
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
9
Synthetic Biology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Journal of Biological Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
16
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
24
BMC Biotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%