Back

Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Envelope and Pulse Timing Interaural Time Differences in Cochlear Implanted Rats with Different Hearing Experiences

Fang, S.; Fleiner, T.; Peng, F.; Buchholz, S.; Zeeshan, M.; Rosskothen-Kuhl, N.; Schnupp, J.

2025-09-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.11.675523 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) have successfully restored hearing in more than one million patients with severe to profound hearing loss worldwide. While CIs effectively restore speech perception in quiet environments, sound localization remains challenging for bilateral CI users, particularly their ability to utilize interaural time differences (ITDs). The majority of clinical CI processors use a coding strategy that encodes ITD information only in the envelope of electrical pulse trains rather than their pulse timing, which may contribute to the poorer spatial hearing perception of CI users. We recently demonstrated in a behavioral study on early deafened, bilaterally CI-implanted rats that pulse timing ITDs completely dominate ITD perception, while sensitivity to envelope ITDs is almost negligible in comparison. Building on this, we here investigated the neurophysiological sensitivity of the inferior colliculus (IC) to envelope and pulse timing ITDs at two different pulse rates (900 and 4500 pulses/s) and three different stimulation modulations (5, 20 and 100 Hz) in CI rats with different hearing experiences. Our results indicate that IC neurons exhibit far greater sensitivity to pulse timing ITD than envelope ITD independent of pulse rate, modulation rate or hearing experience. These findings suggest that to improve binaural hearing outcome in bilateral CI users, clinical stimulation strategies should provide informative pulse timing ITDs. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=131 SRC="FIGDIR/small/675523v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (44K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1874d3borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1df79feorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c244e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@39220f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
4
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
7
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.3%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
15
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
16
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%