Inside the black box: Refining intervention theory in the PriDem dementia care study
Griffiths, S.; Spencer, E.; Robinson, L.; Rait, G.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe PriDem programme developed a flexible, primary care-led intervention to improve post-diagnostic dementia support, involving Clinical Dementia Leads (CDLs) working with general practices to strengthen care systems. Programme theory was articulated in a logic model, to guide a feasibility implementation study, which demonstrated intervention feasibility, acceptability, and potential for systems-level change. The process of refining programme theory following feasibility testing can appear as a black box; rarely reported in detail. This paper presents a structured exemplar of theory refinement, addressing this recognised gap in implementation science. MethodsA deductive thematic analysis was conducted, using the logic model as a framework. We synthesised previously reported findings with new qualitative insights from feasibility interviews, fieldnotes, supervision records and researcher reflections. Confirmed, refined, and newly emergent theoretical components were identified and the logic model updated. ResultsMany original theory elements were confirmed, including improved review processes leading to enhanced care plan personalisation and staff training increasing confidence in care delivery. New mechanisms were identified, such as mapping local services as a relational tool and care planning templates as educational resources. Pre-implementation activities, such as specific CDL training and champion identification, emerged as critical to success. Role ambiguity and capacity concerns acted as negative mechanisms, impeding implementation. These insights informed a revised logic model to guide future scale-up. ConclusionsThis paper demonstrates the value of theory refinement following feasibility testing. By unpacking the black box of implementation, we offer a transparent model for optimising complex interventions in primary care-led dementia support. Trial registration numberISRCTN11677384
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 97%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 94%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How, Why And Under What Circumstances Does A Quality Improvement Collaborative Build Knowledge And Skills In Clinicians Working With People With Dementia? A Realist Informed Process Evaluation 95%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
- Exploring the potential of geospatial mapping of emergency call data to improve ambulance services for older adults: a feasibility study in the South Central region of England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 96%
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 96%
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 93%
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 93%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 95%
- Carers using assistive technology in dementia care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study 95%
- Care homes, their communities, and resilience in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: interim findings from a qualitative study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.