Many Professions, One Voice: The Role of Language, Recognition and Leadership in Shaping Professional Identity Within the Healthcare Science Professions.
Davies, C. B.; Wynn, F.; Bant, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundProfessional Identity (PI) significantly influences how Healthcare Science (HCS) professionals perceive their roles and contributions within the NHS. Strong PI is closely linked to improved collaboration, resilience and patient care, yet research on PI among HCS professionals has been limited. ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate how HCS professionals in NHS Wales perceive their PI and identify factors that shape and support PI. MethodsA mixed-methods approach was employed. 263 participants answered an initial survey and a further 42 participants attended focus groups to discuss attitudes and experiences in greater depth. ResultsKey findings highlight the essential role of professional recognition, the impact of professional bodies, the importance of language and the influence of mentorship and team culture in shaping PI. ConclusionsThe findings support recommendations for enhanced involvement of professional bodies, strategic changes in language and terminology, promotion of professional diversity and the development of robust mentorship and local leadership networks. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is Already Known on This Topic?C_ST_ABSHealthcare science (HCS) professionals account for approximately 7% of the NHS Wales workforce. These professionals are essential to diagnostic services, patient care, quality management and leadership within the NHS. Previous research has found that professional identity (PI) is closely associated with enhanced job satisfaction, effective interprofessional collaboration, professional resilience and successful career progression. The literature also identifies the positive influence of professional recognition, regulatory structures, mentorship and research activities on PI. However, identity research with HCS professionals is limited, with HCS professionals continuing to experience limited visibility and challenges related to professional status and belonging. What this Study AddsThis study fills a crucial gap in the research on PI among HCS professionals. While previous literature established the general importance of PI for job satisfaction, collaboration, and career progression, identity research specific to HCS professionals has been limited, with many facing challenges around visibility, status and belonging. By addressing the specific experiences and needs of HCS professionals, this research advances understanding of PI beyond broader healthcare contexts and acknowledges the challenges faced by smaller workforce groups who often feel underrepresented and overlooked. How this Study Might Affect Research, Practice or PolicyThe findings of this research offer practical directions for enhancing PI among HCS professionals. Strengthening links with professional bodies, revising language to better reflect the diversity and expertise of HCS roles, and building robust mentorship and leadership structures are likely to improve job satisfaction, multidisciplinary work and patient outcomes. Resulting actions have already been incorporated into the workplan for the national HCS workforce transformation programme (the HCS Programme) in NHS Wales.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 97%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 97%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 97%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 95%
- Participant perceptions of disability training for health workers: a qualitative study in Ghana 94%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 95%
- Staff experiences and perspectives of delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 91%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.