Back

High-intensity eccentric hip abductor strength training improves dynamic knee valgus in a task-dependent manner in asymptomatic young women: a pilot study

Fesüs, A.; Hortobagyi, T.; Sebesi, B.; Murlasits, Z.; Ivusza, P.; Prokai, J.; Vadasz, K.; Gaspar, B.; Malmos, V.; Vaczi, M.

2025-09-17 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.09.11.25332758 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDynamic knee valgus is linked to reduced hip abduction strength, a critical factor in knee stability during unilateral movements. While interventions to reduce dynamic knee valgus often use traditional hip abduction training, many neglect the eccentric function of hip abductors, essential for controlling femoral medial translation. This pilot study compared the effects of a four-week-long eccentric vs. concentric hip abduction training on hip abduction torque, countermovement jump performance, dynamic knee valgus measured during one-legged jumping and drop landing, and determined if reductions in dynamic knee valgus correlated with increases in hip abduction torque and countermovement jump performance. Materials and MethodsAsymptomatic, physically active female college students (n = 20, 21.3 {+/-} 2.51 years) with dynamic knee valgus were randomized to either eccentric or concentric hip abduction strength training. Testing included maximum hip abduction torque on an isokinetic dynamometer, single-leg countermovement jumps, and single-leg drop landings analyzed with 3D motion tracking. Participants trained three times per week for four weeks, performing four sets of 10 maximal effort repetitions. ResultsThe two groups did not differ at baseline in any outcomes (all p > 0.05). Eccentric hip abduction torque improved over time (F = 39.7, p < 0.001) without a group-by-time interaction. dynamic knee valgus decreased during single-leg countermovement jumps (time main effect: F = 33.5, p < 0.05) and single-leg drop landings (time main effect: F = 14.8, p < 0.05). The reductions in dynamic knee valgus, measured during single-leg countermovement jumps, were greater (p < 0.05) after eccentric vs. concentric training (group by time interaction: F = 5.57, p < 0.05). countermovement jump improved similarly in the two groups (time main effect: F = 5.1, p < 0.05), without group by time interaction. Improvements in hip abduction maximal torque and countermovement jump performance, and changes in dynamic knee valgus outcomes did not correlate (p > 0.05). ConclusionsHigh-intensity eccentric hip abductor strength training was superior in dynamic knee valgus improvement measured during single-leg countermovement jump but not during drop landings in asymptomatic young women.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
34.6%
2
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
5
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
11
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%