Gene network switching provides a mechanistic basis for time-to-space translation in insect embryonic patterning
Ahmadi, M.; Rudolf, H.; Mau, C.; Garcia-Guillen, J.; El-Sherif, E.
Show abstract
The French Flag model has long served as the prevailing framework for explaining how morphogen gradients generate spatial domains during embryonic development. More recently, however, evidence has shown that many tissues instead establish patterns by translating the sequential activation of genes (organized into genetic cascades) into spatial domains. This translation is thought to occur through modulation of the speed or timing of cascade progression, but the mechanisms underlying such temporal control remain unclear. Two models have been proposed: the general kinetic modulation model, in which morphogens influence global kinetic factors such as transcription and decay rates, and the gene regulatory network (GRN) switching model, in which morphogens reconfigure regulatory interactions so that genes initially function within a genetic cascade driving sequential activation, but are later integrated into a stabilizing network that locks their expression into mutually reinforcing domains. This transition is hypothesized to occur through a shift from a dynamic GRN (a genetic cascade that drives sequential activations) to a static GRN (a stabilizing network that maintains gene expression domains). Using gap genes in Tribolium castaneum as a model, we combined HCR in situ hybridization, parental RNA interference, and computational modeling to test these hypotheses. We show that gap genes initially act in a genetic cascade producing sequential activations, followed by a morphogen-dependent reconfiguration that stabilizes spatial domains. In particular, we identify the Mlpt-Svb complex as a key stabilizing factor that maintains svb expression anteriorly after its initial activation in the posterior. Computational simulations reproduce experimental phenotypes and support GRN switching as the underlying mechanism. Together, these findings demonstrate how morphogen-driven rewiring of network interactions converts temporal cascades into stable spatial patterns, providing a mechanistic basis for robust anterior- posterior patterning in insect embryos and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell polarity determinant Dlg1 facilitates epithelial invagination by promoting tissue-scale mechanical coordination 95%
- Temporal dynamics of BMP/Nodal ratio drive tissue-specific gastrulation morphogenesis 95%
- The Gq/11 family of Gα subunits is necessary and sufficient for lower jaw development 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling assemblies BAF and PBAF differentially regulate cell cycle exit and cellular invasion in vivo 95%
- The anterior Hox gene ceh-13 and elt-1/GATA activate the posterior Hox genes nob-1 and php-3 to specify posterior lineages in the C. elegans embryo 95%
- Ciona Brachyury proximal and distal enhancers have different FGF dose-response relationships 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coordinated crosstalk between microtubules and actin by a spectraplakin regulates lumen formation and branching 96%
- How enhancers regulate wavelike gene expression patterns: Novel enhancer prediction and live reporter systems identify an enhancer associated with the arrest of pair-rule waves in the short-germ beetle Tribolium 96%
- Cell-to-cell heterogeneity in Sox2 and Brachyury expression ratios guides progenitor destiny by controlling their motility. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Live Analysis of Position Effect Variegation (PEV) in Drosophila Reveals Different Modes of Action for HP1a and Su(var)3-9 95%
- Cytokinetic abscission is part of the mid-blastula transition switch in early zebrafish embryogenesis 95%
- A Hedgehog-FGF signaling axis patterns anterior mesoderm during gastrulation 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.