Back

Insectivores exhibit superior microbial transmission efficiency and elevated zoonotic risk by 2035 relative to rodents and bats

Li, H.; Huang, Z. Y. X.; Lan, J.; Hu, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Santini, L.; Becker, D.; Wei, F.; Xu, Y.

2025-09-16 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.10.675328 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wild small mammals represent critical sources of zoonotic infections due to their high diversity, global distribution, and proximity to humans. Nevertheless, significant knowledge gaps persist in characterizing pan-taxonomic microbial richness and sharing dynamics, particularly regarding ecologically critical yet understudied Eulipotyphla (true insectivores). Here we take a macroecological approach to compare how microbial hosting and transmission differ across insectivores, rodents, and bats, and what ecological factors drive such disparities. We find that insectivores host comparable microbial richness to rodents and bats while exhibiting superior intra- and cross-order transmission efficiency. Urban adaptation, geographic range area, and longevity are shared drivers of microbial richness and transmission across these host orders, while greater body mass and shorter gestation time specifically are positive predictors of these outcomes within insectivores. Climate change projections identify insectivores as primary transmission hosts in new high-latitude hotspots by 2035, including parts of the US, Canada, and Russia, posing greater zoonotic threats than rodents or bats. Our findings challenge the prevailing paradigm that prioritizes rodents and bats as special zoonotic reservoirs, establishing insectivores as critical but overlooked players in disease ecology. Collective proactive surveillance of insectivores, rodents, and bats is imperative for forecasting emerging zoonotic threats and informing global risk assessment frameworks.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.