Back

Pathological Angiogenesis Precedes the Onset of Aortic Dissection

Yoshioka, K.; Iino, K.; Ito, Y.; Iba, T.; Matsuzaki, T.; Sakurai, N.; Horie, M.; Matsuyama, T.; Wakabayashi, T.; Matsui, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Satoh, T.; Goto, A.; Yoshikawa, H. Y.; Ando, H.; Maeda, D.; Takemura, H.; Naito, H.

2025-09-16 pathology
10.1101/2025.09.10.675317 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe, life-threatening disease that occurs abruptly1. Although remodeling and inherent vulnerability of the aortic media, as observed in heritable connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syndrome, have been implicated in the onset of AD, the precise pathological mechanisms underlying the non-heritable form, which accounts for most cases, remains largely unknown2. Here, using hyperacute AD patient-derived samples, we show that pathological angiogenesis within the aortic media precedes the onset of dissection. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic analysis of aortic medial endothelial cells with high-resolution imaging revealed temporal changes preceding dissection. Hypoxic alterations in the media triggered osteochondrogenic changes in smooth muscle cells, promoted hydroxyapatite deposition, and induced angiogenesis via VEGF secretion from AD-specific CD14+CD68+CD163+MRC1(CD206)neg-low macrophages. Atomic force microscopy revealed that these processes culminated in the formation of a soft capillary layer, potentially concentrating stress on this region and contributing to AD onset. H&E staining of archived specimens revealed that non-heritable AD can be classified into angiogenic or non-angiogenic subtypes, with more than half exhibiting the former. In contrast, acute AD cases associated with Marfan syndrome typically exhibit a non-angiogenic pattern, suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms. This study reports angiogenesis as a key pathological driver in non-heritable AD and highlight potential targets for early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.