Frequency-dependent Inhibition during Deep Brain Stimulation of Thalamic Ventral Intermediate Nuclei

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) has been a standard therapy for essential tremor. It has been shown that high frequency ([&ge;]100Hz) DBS suppresses Vim neuronal firing and tremor activity, however, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here, we use in vivo recordings (single-unit) of Vim neurons (n=19, people with essential tremor) during different DBS frequencies to investigate whether neuronal suppression during high-frequency DBS occurs at synaptic/cellular levels (e.g., cell inhibition due to synaptic depression/fatigue during high-frequency DBS) or is influenced by network-level effects (e.g., recurrent inhibition). We propose a theoretical framework that explains DBS effects at both cellular and network levels, i.e., (continuous) high-frequency DBS not only depresses synapses projecting to Vim but also enables the recruitment of inhibitory neurons. A transient burst in the spiking activity of Vim during high-frequency DBS, prior to neuronal suppression, is likely providing sufficient network engagement to recruit inhibitory neurons that are silent during low-frequency DBS. Further, we detected a positive-going evoked-field potential effect, hereafter referred to as quasi-evoked inhibition, during high-frequency (100 Hz and 200 Hz) Vim-DBS in four out of 19 recording sites. Interestingly, it was observed that (i) neuronal suppression is stronger in these four neurons (P < 0.05), implying that inhibitory engagement during high-frequency DBS can further suppress neuronal firing, and (ii) quasi-evoked inhibition emerges after the transient burst (P < 1.00 x 10-7), i.e., the latter may give rise to the former. By removing DBS artifacts with a novel algorithm and characterizing the dynamics of quasi-evoked inhibitory activity, we showed that the likelihood of occurrence of this inhibitory activity negatively correlated with the instantaneous firing rate (P < 1.00 x 10-5). These results suggest that an excitatory-inhibitory balance is likely regulating Vim activities during high-frequency DBS. Our findings shed light on potential network mechanisms underlying Vim-DBS, which can provide insight for optimizing DBS by designing new stimulation patterns.