Parenthood, Caregiving and Female Fertility Among General Internal Medicine Physicians in Switzerland
Egger, I.; Weidlinger, S.; Zdanowicz, J.; Kublickiene, K.; Nater, C.; Streit, S.; Moor, J.
Show abstract
Background/ImportanceBalancing work and family life is a particular challenge for physicians, yet finding a good balance is crucial given that childcare responsibilities and institutional support strongly influence career trajectories. This study examined female fertility and gender differences in family founding, working hours and childcare responsibilities among physicians in Switzerland. ObjectiveCharacterize fertility and family-founding among women physicians, compare womens and mens family-founding attitudes, and examine how work patterns, caregiving responsibilities and perceived institutional support relate to reproductive outcomes. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsSecondary analysis of an existing, anonymous, cross-sectional, web-based survey of the Swiss internal medicine workforce (fielded from December 2021 to April 2022). Main Outcomes and MeasuresDesire to have children, past or current intent to delay childbearing, self-reported female infertility, number of children, maternal age at first birth, perceived adequacy of external childcare, and employer respect of pregnancy-related working-hour limits. Group comparisons used Welchs t-tests and chi-square tests, and associations with workload used linear regression models. ResultsThis analysis included 682 physicians, 278 (41%) men and 404 (59%) women. Mens age was 39{+/-}12 years (mean {+/-} standard deviation [SD]), and womens age was 36{+/-}10 years. The prevalence of self-reported infertility among female physicians was 27.7%, which exceeds Swiss general population estimates of 10-15% (p<0.001). The mean age at first birth among physician-mothers was 31.3 years, which did not differ from the Swiss average (p=0.388). Women physicians had fewer children than men physicians (p=0.006). Among physicians without children, more women (69.8%) than men (51.6%) currently postponed having children (p<0.001). Also, among parents more women (42.2%) than men (21.8%) had delayed having children (p<0.001). Overall, satisfaction with childcare was limited, with 37% of men and 30% of women rating their childcare situation as inadequate. Among women who had ever been pregnant during employment (n = 123), 57% reported that legally prescribed pregnancy-related working-hour limits were not respected. Conclusions and RelevanceIn this national physician sample, women reported having fewer children and more frequently postponing having children than men, and experienced a higher prevalence of self-reported infertility than the Swiss population. Perceived childcare adequacy was suboptimal for both genders, and many reported insufficient adherences to pregnancy-related working-hour protections. Improving scheduling, enforcing maternity protections, increasing access to reliable childcare, and promoting equitable caregiving norms could enhance reproductive and professional outcomes for women in medicine in Switzerland.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 92%
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 92%
- Why women choose abortion through telemedicine outside the formal health sector in Germany? A mixed-methods study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 93%
- Trends in patient attachment to an aging primary care workforce: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada 92%
- The association between work situation and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective cohort study in Norway 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Willing but Unable: Physicians’ Referral Knowledge as Barriers to Abortion Care 92%
- What Explains the Socioeconomic Status-Health Gradient? Evidence from Workplace COVID-19 Infections 89%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 92%
- The impact of residency training in family medicine on hospital admissions due to Ambulatory-care Sensitive Conditions in Rio de Janeiro 92%
- Demographic and professional risk factors of COVID-19 infections among physicians in low- and middle-income settings; findings from a representative survey in two Brazilian states 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.