Bridging Theory and Behavior for Healthcare Accessibility Modeling: A Mobility-Driven Revision of the E2SFCA
Khosravi Kazazi, A.; Li, Z.
Show abstract
Proximity to a healthcare supplier does not necessarily equate to meaningful access to care. Traditional healthcare accessibility models, particularly the Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) method, rely heavily on assumptions of proximity-driven behavior, fixed catchment sizes, and uniform distance decay. These simplifications often overlook the complexities of real-world healthcare-seeking behavior. This study examines the assumptions of the E2SFCA framework by integrating large-scale human mobility data, which captures anonymized, real-world visitation patterns between neighborhoods and hospitals across Pennsylvania. We revise the E2SFCA model through two key innovations: 1) replacing static catchment thresholds with dynamic, visit-weighted boundaries derived from observed travel behavior, and 2) estimating hospital-specific distance decay functions that better reflect heterogeneous patterns of attraction. These refinements result in accessibility metrics that align more closely with empirical realities. Compared to the traditional model, the revised E2SFCA demonstrates a more meaningful relationship with real-world outcomes, showing stronger correlation with household income and a more plausible negative association with poor or fair health status. Additionally, the revised model reveals significantly greater inequality in access, with the Gini coefficient nearly doubling (0.63 vs. 0.31), and shows that 19% of the population accounts for 63% of accessibility, exposing disparities masked by proximity-based approaches. By integrating human mobility data in spatial accessibility modeling, this study offers a more realistic, equitable, and policy-relevant framework for evaluating healthcare access.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian Susceptible-Infectious-Hospitalized-Ventilated-Recovered Model to Predict Demand for COVID-19 Inpatient Care in a Large Healthcare System 92%
- Forecasting hospital demand in metropolitan areas during the current COVID-19 pandemic and estimates of lockdown-induced 2nd waves 92%
- Bayesian Space-time SIR modeling of Covid-19 in two US states during the 2020-2021 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fusing a Bayesian case velocity model with random forest for predicting COVID-19 in the U.S. 91%
- Call detail record aggregation methodology impacts infectious disease models informed by human mobility 90%
- The multi-dimensional challenges of controlling respiratory virus transmission in indoor spaces: Insights from the linkage of a microscopic pedestrian simulation and SARS-CoV-2 transmission model 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- It’s complicated: characterizing the time-varying relationship between cell phone mobility and COVID-19 spread in the US 93%
- Machine Learning Generalizability Across Healthcare Settings: Insights from multi-site COVID-19 screening 90%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multi-Granular Stacked Regression for Forecasting Long-Term Demand in Emergency Departments 92%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 91%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.