Centrosome Softening As A Mechanical Adaptation For Mitosis
Garcia-Baucells, J.; Bevilacqua, C.; Rufin, M.; Rumpf-Kienzl, C.; Zampetaki, A.; Andriotis, O. G.; Thurner, P. J.; Prevedel, R.; Fürthauer, S.; Dammermann, A.
Show abstract
Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers important for mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. During mitosis, centrosomes are exposed to mechanical forces via the microtubules they nucleate, yet the material properties underlying their response to these forces remain poorly understood. In this study, we systematically probed the mechanical behavior of C. elegans centrosomes, both in vitro and in vivo. Using microtubule perturbations and quantitative live cell imaging, we found that centrosomes become increasingly deformed during mitosis. Centrosome deformation is independent of cortical pulling forces but instead results from microtubule polymerization within the pericentriolar material. This deformation impacts centrosome size: as microtubule number decreases with cell volume in early cleavage divisions, centrosome size scales proportionately. To directly measure centrosome elasticity, we employed atomic force microscopy (AFM) on isolated centrosomes in vitro and Brillouin light scattering microscopy in developing embryos in vivo. Both approaches revealed that centrosomes progressively soften during mitosis. Theoretical modeling predicts that softening serves to dampen spindle force fluctuations, helping to protect kinetochore-microtubule interactions and safeguarding chromosome segregation. Further, softening may enhance centrosomal microtubule nucleation capacity, facilitating mitotic spindle assembly, particularly in large early embryonic cells. We propose that centrosome softening is a mechanical adaptation for mitosis that couples microtubule number to centrosome size through force-dependent deformation. This optimally balances two mitotic requirements: the need for robust microtubule nucleation and the ability to withstand spindle forces, thereby ensuring accurate cell division.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variations of intracellular density during the cell cycle arises from tip-growth regulation in fission yeast 96%
- Hundreds of myosin 10s are pushed to the tips of filopodia and could cause traffic jams on actin 95%
- Asymmetric localization of the cell division machinery during Bacillus subtilis sporulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The emergent Yo-yo movement of nuclei driven by collective cytoskeletal remodeling in pseudo-synchronous mitotic cycles 97%
- Mitochondrial function regulates cell growth kinetics to actively maintain mitochondrial homeostasis 96%
- A tension-induced morphological transition shapes the avian extra-embryonic territory 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.