Back

Pentoxifylline, a Non-Antibiotic Drug, Promotes Adaptation of Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus via Modulating c-di-AMP Signaling

Xie, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Hu, X.; Xu, C.; Meng, Y.; Liu, J.-H.; Li, C.-R.; You, X.-F.; Li, G.

2025-09-09 microbiology
10.1101/2025.09.09.675175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigated how Staphylococcus aureus adapts under pentoxifylline (PTX) therapy through analyzing three phylogenetically related isolates (L1, L2, L3) from a bacteremia patient. Whole genome sequencing revealed L1 contained a 2400-bp insertion disrupting nupC, while L3 harbored mutations in the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequences of 16S rRNA. Each isolate evolved distinct mechanisms to reduce c-di-AMP levels, accompanied by changes in survival ability and virulence. Molecular analysis demonstrated PTX noncompetitively inhibits GdpP phosphodiesterase, directly modulating cyclic diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) signaling. Our findings provide novel insights into how non-antibiotic medications shape bacterial adaptation through second messenger modulation, highlighting the complex trade-offs between stress resistance and fitness in clinical settings. ImportanceThis study reveals how pentoxifylline, a non-antibiotic drug, drives Staphylococcus aureus adaptation by modulating c-di-AMP signaling. Our findings highlight the unintended consequences of non-antibiotic medications on bacterial evolution, offering new insights for clinical treatment strategies to mitigate resistance development. HighlightsO_LIPTX noncompetitively inhibits GdpP, modulating bacterial c-di-AMP signaling C_LIO_LIS. aureus evolves distinct mechanisms to reduce c-di-AMP under PTX pressure C_LIO_LINon-antibiotic medications significantly shape bacterial adaptive trajectories C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.