Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-associated 3' UTR enhancer embedded within CAV1 risk gene
Harrison, L. J.; Moll, T.; Cooper-Knock, J.; Bose, D. A.
Show abstract
Enhancer elements that reside within 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) are an understudied phenomenon. Given the independent regulatory functions of enhancers and 3' UTRs - enhancers governing pre-transcriptional control of gene expression and 3' UTRs mediating post-transcriptional regulation of messenger RNA (mRNA) fate - 3' UTR-associated enhancers may integrate these complementary layers to coordinate gene expression across multiple regulatory stages. Non-coding variation, impacting regulatory DNA, underpins the genetic architecture of disease. Indeed, the vast majority of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with human complex diseases map to the non-coding genome, with causal variants particularly enriched within enhancers. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder associated with non-coding risk variants, many of which are increasingly linked to enhancer disruption. The CAV1 gene, encoding the neuroprotective protein Caveolin-1, is a known ALS risk gene, yet the functional consequences of ALS-associated variation in its regulatory elements remain largely unexplored. Here, we combine genome-wide enhancer profiling with targeted experimental validation to define a previously uncharacterised ALS-associated enhancer embedded within the CAV1 3' UTR, systematically assess its regulatory potential, and evaluate the impact of ALS-associated SNPs on enhancer function. We show that an individual ALS-associated SNP within this 3' UTR-associated enhancer may disrupt function on multiple levels: at the DNA and chromatin level, by altering transcription factor binding with potential effects on recruitment of epigenetic co-regulators; and at the RNA level, by reshaping the structure and stability of a novel enhancer RNA transcribed from this locus. Collectively, our findings highlight this proximal CAV1/CAV2 enhancer as a functionally important regulatory element embedded with the 3' UTR of an ALS risk gene, illustrate how non-coding variants can impact multiple layers of gene regulation, and provide mechanistic insight into how intragenic enhancers contribute to ALS risk. More broadly, this work underscores the importance of 3' UTR-associated enhancers as modulators of risk gene expression and underexplored contributors to human complex disease.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell-specific exon methylation and CTCF binding in neurons regulates calcium ion channel splicing and function 95%
- FMRP promotes RNA localization to neuronal projections through interactions between its RGG domain and G-quadruplex sequences 95%
- Dilated cardiomyopathy-associated RNA Binding Motif Protein 20 regulates long pre-mRNAs in neurons 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alternative translation initiation produces synaptic organizer proteoforms with distinct localization and functions 95%
- Swi/Snf Chromatin Remodeling Regulates Transcriptional Interference and Gene Repression 94%
- RNA methylation influences TDP43 binding and disease pathogenesis in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MeCP2 Represses the Activity of Topoisomerase IIβ in Long Neuronal Genes 95%
- FAN1 nuclease processes and pauses on disease-associated slipped-DNA repeats: Mechanism against repeat expansions 95%
- Truncated RNA-binding protein production by DUX4-induced systemic inhibition of nonsense-mediated RNA decay 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ERH regulates type II interferon immune signaling through post-transcriptional regulation of JAK2 mRNA 95%
- Homeobox transcription factor MNX1 is crucial for restraining the expression of pan-neuronal genes in motor neurons 95%
- The phase separation-dependent FUS interactome reveals nuclear and cytoplasmic function of liquid-liquid phase separation 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.