Back

Fine-scale animal proximity detection and localization via multi-sensor biologgers

Rogers, W.; Mattingly, S. J.; Kohles, J. E.; Linek, N.; Williams, H. J.; Lenzi, I.; Wilbs, G.; Escher, M.; Richter, N.; van Schalkwyk, L.; Ezenwa, V. O.; Wikelski, M.; Dechmann, D. K.; Wild, T. A.

2025-09-14 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.09.674951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIAccurately quantifying spatial interactions is central to understanding social behavior, information flow, predator-prey dynamics, and disease transmission. Proximity loggers that record received signal strength indicator (RSSI) offer a promising approach for estimating pairwise distances, particularly in environments where GPS is unavailable or imprecise. However, RSSI is often dismissed as too noisy for fine-scale inference, with performance that depends on environmental conditions, tag orientation, and between-device variability. Incorporating additional tag-measured data may improve RSSI performance and enable its use as a continuous measure of distance in variable environments. C_LIO_LIHere, we assess the utility of continuous RSSI as a fine-scale distance estimator and localization tool using a novel multi-sensor WiFi biologger (WildFi). We conducted four experiments: (1) testing how tag orientation affects RSSI-distance relationships; (2) evaluating whether environmental covariates measured by onboard sensors improve proximity estimates; (3) assessing the accuracy of trilateration-based tag localization using fixed gateway arrays; and (4) comparing RSSI- and GPS-inferred proximity in free-ranging Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). C_LIO_LIWhile RSSI alone could predict distance with reasonable accuracy, incorporating additional tag-sensed information (e.g., temperature, humidity, barometric pressure) and accounting for tag-level heterogeneity significantly improved predictive accuracy. Based on RSSI predictions, we could estimate tag location with a median error of 2.6 meters, accurate enough to indirectly estimate proximity networks without tag-to-tag communication. In deployments on free-flying bats, we found that RSSI and GPS were only weakly concordant, with GPS unreliable for detecting fine-scale interactions (<50 m). In contrast, RSSI could capture both fine-scale and some long-range interactions up to [~]250m. C_LIO_LIThese findings highlight RSSIs potential as a robust metric for proximity logging, particularly when combined with multi-sensor data and pre-deployment validations. Integrating multi-sensor data streams further enhances RSSI interpretability. Future biologger designs should prioritize synergy among data streams for integrated insights into proximity and animal behavior. C_LI Data and code for peer review statementData and code to reproduce the results of the paper are provided in a zip folder for peer review. We also provided our compiled code.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.