Interareal and interlaminar differences in sound envelope encoding in core and parabelt auditory cortex
Mackey, C. A.; Kajikawa, Y.
Show abstract
Amplitude-modulation (AM) is critical for the perception of complex sounds, and transformations in AM encoding may underlie primate-specific aspects of complex sound perception. The nonhuman primate model provides an opportunity to understand what circuit mechanisms generate hierarchical and interhemispheric transformations of AM encoding in different circuits across the cortical hierarchy. To address this, here we report the encoding of AM signals as a function of cortical layer and hemisphere in primary area A1 and the tertiary parabelt (PB) area of five NHPs. We presented AM noise and click trains to awake NHPs while recording from linear array multielectrodes straddling cortical layers. A1 typically encoded all AM frequencies (1.6-200 Hz) with high (> 90%) classification accuracy, while the PB encoded lower ([~]1.6-25 Hz) frequencies. The granular and infragranular layers displayed enhanced AM encoding relative to the supragranular layers in A1, but this deep-layer enhancement was reduced in the PB. Both areas displayed enhanced AM encoding in the left hemisphere, restricted to the supragranular layers. These results represent the first analysis of AM encoding in the PB, in which we identify circuits differ in their temporal sensitivity across the hierarchy, and suggest local supragranular neuronal populations contribute to hemispheric specialization.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Irrelevant Predictions: Distractor Rhythmicity Modulates Neural Encoding in Auditory Cortex 96%
- Decoding of attentional state using high-frequency local field potential is as accurate as using spikes 96%
- Dissociable neural information dynamics of perceptual integration and differentiation during bistable perception 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.