Verbal recall captures neural encoding of a drug-themed movie in heroin use disorder
King, S. G.; Kronberg, G.; McClain, N. E.; Zhang, Z.; Ceceli, A. O.; Huang, Y.; Alia-Klein, N.; Goldstein, R. Z.
Show abstract
Language transforms subjective internal states into observable behavior, enabling investigation of the neurocognitive dynamics central to psychiatric conditions. Intense emotional and physiological responses to evocative drug-related contexts precipitate craving and drug seeking in substance use disorders, yet sensitive, accessible behavioral markers of the underlying neural dynamics remain elusive. In this fMRI study, we analyzed individuals unconstrained verbal recall of their subjective experiences after watching a drug-themed movie, including inpatients in treatment for heroin use disorder (HUD) and healthy controls, with speech recorded outside the scanner under minimal instructions. The semantic context of these accounts, assessed using transformer-based embeddings, effectively predicted both HUD diagnosis and treatment progression, with earlier treatment characterized by heightened self-reference and drug focus but less socially oriented recall. Semantic similarities between individuals reflected synchronized activation patterns in dorsal attention and visual networks during movie viewing, linking motivated attentional processing to later recall. With treatment, most HUD-biased semantic features shifted toward control-like patterns, while drug focus persisted; the semantic-neural link was attenuated though partially remained. These results suggest that spontaneous speech, collected offline, can provide a sensitive behavioral readout of both treatment effects and neural encoding of a complex, personally relevant, drug-related context. offering a scalable approach for monitoring neurocognitive dynamics in real-world settings.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Common and distinct brain activity associated with risky and ambiguous decision-making 95%
- Brain Network Segregation is Associated with Drug Use Severity in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder 95%
- Cue-Induced Craving and Negative Emotion Disrupt Response Inhibition in Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Behavioral and fMRI Results from a Mixed Go/No-Go Task 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methamphetamine modulates functional connectivity signatures of sustained attention and arousal 94%
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 94%
- Cognitive Phenotype Shifts in Risk-Taking: Interplay of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Behaviors and Intensified Depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder 93%
- Change in Striatal Functional Connectivity Networks Across Two Years Due to Stimulant Exposure in Childhood ADHD: Results from the ABCD Sample 93%
- Novel polygenic risk score as a translational tool linking depression-related changes in the corticolimbic transcriptome with neural face processing and anhedonic symptoms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Not all smokers are alike: The hidden cost of sustained attention during nicotine abstinence 94%
- Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not cognitive control: converging fMRI evidence from Go-Nogo and Flanker tasks 94%
- Neuroimaging correlates and predictors of response to repeated-dose intravenous ketamine in PTSD 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neural signature of impaired inhibitory control in individuals with heroin use disorder 94%
- The angiotensin antagonist Losartan modulates social reward motivation and punishment sensitivity via modulating midbrain-striato-frontal circuits 94%
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.