Back

Panorama of Chromosomal Instability in Lung Cancer

Yang, Y.; Zhong, X.; Phillips, W.; Zhao, W.; Hoang, P. H.; Wirth, C.; Yang, S.-R.; Leduc, C.; Baine, M. K.; Travis, W. D.; Sholl, L. M.; Joubert, P.; Homer, R.; Sang, J.; Khandekar, A.; McElderry, J. P.; Tran, T.-V.-T.; Hartman, C.; Miraftab, M.; Saha, M.; Lee, O. W.; Sharma, S.; Jones, K. M.; Zhu, B.; Diaz-Gay, M.; Edell, E. S.; Santamaria, J. M.; Schabath, M. B.; Yendamuri, S. S.; Manczuk, M.; Lissowska, J.; Swiatkowska, B.; Mukeria, A.; Shangina, O.; Zaridze, D.; Holcatova, I.; Janout, V.; Mates, D.; Ognjanovic, S.; Savic, M.; Kontic, M.; Bosse, Y.; Rothberg, B. E. G.; Christiani, D. C.; Ga

2025-09-12 oncology
10.1101/2025.09.09.25335109 medRxiv
Show abstract

Lung cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease primarily driven by tobacco smoking. About 20% of lung cancers occur among patients who have never smoked (LCINS) with differences in patient ancestry, sex, tumor histology, and clinical features. Our understanding of chromosomal instability in lung cancer, especially LCINS, is still limited. Here, we perform a comprehensive study of 182,429 somatic structural variations (SVs) detected in 1,209 whole-genome sequenced lung cancers, of which 864 LCINS. SVs are more abundant in tumors from patients who have smoked (LCSS); however, they are more complex and play more important roles in tumorigenesis in LCINS. EGFR mutations and KRAS mutations profoundly and independently shape the SV landscape. EGFR-mutant tumors have higher SV burden and more cancer-driving SVs. In contrast, KRAS mutations are associated with lower SV burden and less driver SVs. We decompose 16 SV signatures for both complex and simple SVs that likely represent divergent molecular mechanisms. The SV breakpoints have distinct distributions across the genome depending on the signatures due to mutagenic mechanisms and positive selection. Many established cancer-driving genes are recurrently rearranged by multiple SV signatures suggesting functional convergence of these genome instability mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.