Back

Epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of wellbeing

Bartels, M.; van de Weijer, M. P.; Azcona Granada, N.; Baselmans, B. M. L.; Suderman, M.; Soerensen, M.; Buchwald, J.; Mulder, R. H.; Rawal, R.; Luciano, M.; Bonder, M. J.; Choudhary, P.; Lowry, E.; Lind, P.; Schwartz, J.; Debrabant, B.; Ollikainen, M.; Felix, J.; Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.; Tiemeier, H.; Gieger, C.; Waldenberger, M.; Martin, N. G.; Vokonas, P.; Baccarelli, A.; Christensen, K.; Kaprio, J.; van Ijzendoorn, M.; Emeny, R.; Deary, I.; Franke, L.; Sebert, S.; McRae, A.; Spiro, A.; van Dongen, J.

2025-09-12 genomics
10.1101/2025.09.08.674802 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wellbeing is associated with both behavioral phenotypes as well as several key life outcomes, such as health, employment, and coping with stressful events. These phenotypes associated with wellbeing could be potential indicators of differential epigenetic patterns between individuals that differ in their levels of wellbeing. We performed the largest epigenome-wide (EWAS) meta-analysis of wellbeing to date by combining whole blood DNA methylation data (Illumina 450k array) from 13 cohorts from Europe, Australia, and the USA (N = 10,757 participants). After correcting for smoking and BMI, no epigenome-wide significant methylation sites were identified. We tested whether a weighted methylation score (MS) based on leave-one-cohort-out EWAS meta-analysis summary statistics predicted wellbeing in an independent cohort, and whether prediction was significant over and above the polygenic score (PGS) for wellbeing. The MS was associated with wellbeing (variance explained=0.22%, p=0.03) and was no longer significant after adding the polygenic score (PGS; variance explained=0.43%, p=0.0046, MS; variance explained=0.07%, p=0.2842). We further compared DNA methylation levels in 16 pairs of monozygotic twins discordant for wellbeing. These analyses revealed no significant within-pair DNA methylation differences at the top-sites from the meta-analysis or in MS. Our results suggest that larger EWAS meta-analyses with uniform phenotype assessment are required to identify methylation sites associated with wellbeing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
5
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
8
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
11
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
15
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
28
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%