Taf1 expression in mouse: novel transcripts and protein distribution
Li, P.; Cleverley, K.; Crombie, E. M.; Bieschke, J.; Fisher, E.; Brown, A.-L.
Show abstract
TATA-box binding protein associated factor 1 (TAF1) is the largest component of transcription factor IID (TFIID), a fundamental multiprotein complex for RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription. TAF1 is essential for promoter recognition, coactivator interaction, and normal development. Mutations in TAF1 cause developmental disorders and the lethal neurodegenerative disease X-linked dystonia-Parkinsonism (XDP). Our previous work suggested that this [~]170 kb gene has a more complex set of transcripts than currently catalogued. We therefore undertook a systematic assessment of Taf1 transcription in mouse, given its widespread use as a model organism and its high genetic homology with humans. Using targeted nanopore sequencing, we reveal extensive transcriptional diversity and differential abundance of Taf1 mRNAs across brain and body regions. We identify 19 novel transcript variants and multiple novel exons, and we predicted their protein domain architectures and modelled them using AlphaFold. Notably, we observed elevated RNA and protein expression in cerebellum compared to other brain regions. These findings substantially expand the transcriptional landscape of Taf1 and provide crucial insights to guide investigation of transcript-specific mechanisms in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, enabling the creation of more accurate disease models. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=103 SRC="FIGDIR/small/674157v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c31231org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1df8a57org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f35bd8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@112c264_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tagging allows faithful tracing of expression and enhances biochemical detection of Ran Binding Protein 9 in vivo and reveals its interaction with Nucleolin. 96%
- Characterization of the nuclear and cytosolic transcriptomes in human brain tissue reveals new insights into the subcellular distribution of RNA transcripts 95%
- Identification of new interactors of eIF3f by endogenous proximity-dependent biotin labelling in human muscle cells. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Isoform-specific characterization implicates alternative splicing in APOBEC3B as a mechanism restricting APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis 95%
- A Cre-dependent massively parallel reporter assay allows for cell-type specific assessment of the functional effects of non-coding elements in vivo 94%
- Shifts in isoform usage underlie transcriptional differences in regulatory T cells in type 1 diabetes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- H2A.Z is dispensable for both basal and activated transcription in post-mitotic mouse muscles 95%
- Epigenetic Control of Adaptive or Homeostatic Splicing of Alternative Exons and Prolactin Gene Expression During Interval-Training Activities of Pituitary Cells 94%
- Cytoplasmic Switch of ARS2 Isoforms Promotes Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and Arsenic Sensitivity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- MYT1L deficiency impairs excitatory neuron trajectory during cortical development 95%
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Excision of ALS/FTD-Causing Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion in C9ORF72 rescues major disease mechanisms in vivo and in vitro 94%
- A C. elegans model of C9orf72-associated ALS/FTD uncovers a conserved role for eIF2D in RAN translation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The ribose methylation enzyme FTSJ1 has a conserved role in neuron morphology and learning performance 95%
- Small non-coding vault RNA1-2 modulate expression of cell membrane proteins through nascent RNA silencing 93%
- Profiling subcellular localization of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial gene products in zebrafish 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.