Back

Taf1 expression in mouse: novel transcripts and protein distribution

Li, P.; Cleverley, K.; Crombie, E. M.; Bieschke, J.; Fisher, E.; Brown, A.-L.

2025-09-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.09.08.674157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

TATA-box binding protein associated factor 1 (TAF1) is the largest component of transcription factor IID (TFIID), a fundamental multiprotein complex for RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription. TAF1 is essential for promoter recognition, coactivator interaction, and normal development. Mutations in TAF1 cause developmental disorders and the lethal neurodegenerative disease X-linked dystonia-Parkinsonism (XDP). Our previous work suggested that this [~]170 kb gene has a more complex set of transcripts than currently catalogued. We therefore undertook a systematic assessment of Taf1 transcription in mouse, given its widespread use as a model organism and its high genetic homology with humans. Using targeted nanopore sequencing, we reveal extensive transcriptional diversity and differential abundance of Taf1 mRNAs across brain and body regions. We identify 19 novel transcript variants and multiple novel exons, and we predicted their protein domain architectures and modelled them using AlphaFold. Notably, we observed elevated RNA and protein expression in cerebellum compared to other brain regions. These findings substantially expand the transcriptional landscape of Taf1 and provide crucial insights to guide investigation of transcript-specific mechanisms in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, enabling the creation of more accurate disease models. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=103 SRC="FIGDIR/small/674157v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c31231org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1df8a57org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f35bd8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@112c264_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.