TITLE : "Tissue Eosinophil Counts as Predictors of Infliximab Response in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Nested Case Control Study"
L'Heureux-Hubert, E.; Sassine, S.; Ferrante, S.; Jantchou, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundInfliximab is an effective therapy for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but a substantial proportion of patients experience primary non-response or relapse. Tissue eosinophilia has been implicated in treatment resistance, yet its predictive value in pediatric populations remains unclear. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective nested case-control study including 80 pediatric IBD patients treated with infliximab at CHU Sainte-Justine between 2014 and 2023 Relapse cases (n = 42) were defined by an increase in the short Pediatric Crohns Disease Activity Index (sPCDAI) [≥]10, and compared with non-relapse controls (n = 38). Tissue eosinophil counts were quantified from diagnostic biopsies by blinded reviewers. Primary non-response was defined as a lack of clinical improvement before treatment change. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess associations between eosinophil counts and treatment outcomes. Results80 patients were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 14.4 years (interquarile range [IQR] 3.65). Forty patients had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC, 50%) and the other half had a diagnosis of Crohns disease (CD). Baseline eosinophil counts were not associated with subsequent relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, p = 0.31), and ROC analysis demonstrated poor discrimination (AUC 0.57). In contrast, higher eosinophil counts were associated with primary non-response in ulcerative colitis patients (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16, p = 0.03). A cutoff of a median of [≥] 36 eosinophils per high-power field among all segments yielded 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity for predicting primary non-response (AUC 0.82). ConclusionTissue eosinophil counts do not predict relapse in pediatric IBD patients treated with infliximab. However, elevated counts may identify ulcerative colitis patients at risk of primary non-response, suggesting a role for histological stratification in guiding the selection of biologics. Prospective validation in larger cohorts is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Epithelial cell biomarkers are predictive of response to biologic agents in Crohn's disease 97%
- Humoral Immunogenicity of Three COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Doses in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease 95%
- Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 after Infection or Vaccination in Children and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in pregnant women receiving biologics for inflammatory bowel disease 94%
- High circulating elafin levels are associated with Crohn’s disease-associated intestinal strictures 93%
- An oral cholera vaccine in the prevention and/or treatment of inflammatory bowel disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- One-Year Follow-up of Young People with ME/CFS Following Infectious Mononucleosis by Epstein-Barr Virus 89%
- Potential of host serum protein biosignatures in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in children 88%
- Inflammatory Biomarkers and Physiomarkers of Late-Onset Sepsis and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Infants 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimising Early Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologics Era: Admission Model for Intensification of Therapy in Acute Severe Colitis (ADMIT–ASC) 95%
- Maintenance therapy with infliximab or vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: UK experience in the 2020 pandemic 93%
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.