Strength-Duration Curve Outcomes, Profiles and Evidence in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Scoping Review (SCOPE-SCI Study)
Singh, I.; Gera, A.; Luthra, T.; Arora, I.
Show abstract
IntroductionNeuromuscular and functional electrical stimulation (NMES/FES) are widely used in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation to preserve muscle health, manage spasticity, and support functional recovery. However, stimulation protocols typically use fixed parameters with limited individualisation. The strength-duration (SD) curve, reflecting the relationship between pulse duration and stimulus intensity required for muscle contraction, captures excitability changes due to denervation, reinnervation, and training. While historically used in neurophysiology, its translational role in guiding NMES/FES programming in SCI rehabilitation remains unclear. This scoping review aims to map current evidence on SD-curve measurement, outcomes, and clinical applications in SCI. Methods and analysisThis protocol follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and grey literature sources from inception to present. Eligible studies will include adults with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI, reporting SD curves or related excitability measures (rheobase, chronaxie, accommodation index). Data extraction will capture study characteristics, methods of SD-curve measurement, rheobase/chronaxie values, clinical applications (diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic), and outcomes of SD-guided NMES/FES interventions. Results will be presented descriptively and thematically, with tables and figures mapping measurement approaches, reported values, and translational applications. Methodological and reporting gaps will be highlighted. Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, international conferences, and to inform future pilot studies on SD-curve-guided rehabilitation in SCI.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 94%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 93%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation Enables Volitional Anti-Gravity Leg Movements After Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Responders vs. Non-Responders 97%
- Positive effects of functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling on perception of effort, cerebral blood flow and cognition in post-stroke patients 93%
- Brain-Computer Interface Robotics for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury 93%
- Influence of fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation 93%
- Probing the orientation specificity of excitatory and inhibitory circuitries in the primary motor cortex with multi-channel TMS 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of motor evoked potentials in patients with peripheral vascular disease. 94%
- Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits. 93%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multipoint Stimulation Motor Unit Number Estimation of the Extensor Indicis and Anconeus after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury 95%
- The Impact of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor rs6265 (Val66Met) Polymorphism on Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Preclinical Study of Therapy-Genotype Interactions 92%
- Comparison between conventional electrodes and ultrasound monitoring to measure TMS evoked muscle contraction 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.