Back

QVT Score, a radiomic biomarker of vascular complexity, enables prognostication and monitoring of NSCLC immunotherapy

Chae, Y. K.; Velcheti, V.; Zhang, K.; Hiremath, A.; Chung, L. I.-Y.; Haji-Maghsoudi, O.; Chitalia, R.; Lee, J.; Li, H.; Lee, S.; Mutha, P.; Nagabhushan, R.; Levy, D.; Cantor, D.; Kim, Y.; Haseok Kim, P.; Gupta, A.; Arul, T.; Madabhushi, A.; Braman, N.

2025-09-12 oncology
10.1101/2025.09.08.25335020 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet current biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and response criteria (RECIST v1.1) align poorly with long-term survival. Radiomics has been proposed as a source of novel biomarkers, but standard radiomic approaches suffer from limited biological interpretability and poor generalizability across treatment settings. We address these gaps by developing the Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity (QVT) Score, a biologically interpretable imaging biomarker that quantifies tumor vascular complexity -a known mediator of immune evasion - from routine imaging. We hypothesized that QVT Score would improve prognostication and enable treatment response monitoring in ICI-treated NSCLC, independent of current biomarkers. MethodsThis retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 1,301 CT scans from 682 ICI-treated NSCLC patients. An automated pipeline segmented lesions and tumor-associated vasculature within each scan, extracting 910 QVT features measuring vascular shape and complexity. Unsupervised clustering of these features in a discovery cohort (N=375) was performed to identify fundamental vascular phenotypes. A continuous QVT score was then derived using regularized logistic regression to map patients along this phenotypic spectrum. QVT Score was externally validated in ICI monotherapy (N=172) and chemoimmunotherapy (N=135) cohorts. In a longitudinal cohort (n=143), early on-treatment QVT Score changes were evaluated for overall survival (OS) association. ResultsTwo robust vascular phenotypes emerged in the discovery cohort: a highly vascularized, chaotic "QVT High" phenotype with poor post-ICI OS and a "QVT Low" phenotype with normalized vasculature and improved ICI outcomes. The continuous QVT Score was prognostic for ICI monotherapy (HR = 1.17 per 0.1 increase, p = 0.0028) and chemoimmunotherapy (HR = 1.23 per 0.1 increase, p = 4.9x10-). High QVT status remained prognostic for both treatments after adjustment for PD-L1 and clinical variables (adjusted HR range: 2.13-2.38, p [≤] 0.002). Early decreases in QVT Score during therapy, indicating vascular normalization, were associated with improved OS (HR = 1.93, p = 0.0022) independent of RECIST best overall response and tumor volume change. ConclusionsQVT Score is a novel, biologically interpretable imaging biomarker that quantifies vascular complexity. It enables automated, non-invasive prediction and monitoring of ICI outcomes by capturing treatment-induced vascular remodeling. Integrating QVT Score into clinical decision-making and drug development can address critical gaps in precision oncology.

Published in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
6
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
7
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
21
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
22
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · published here
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
26
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%