Back

Effects of heatwrap and exercise in acute low back pain: a multi-arm randomised controlled trial

Cote-Picard, C.; Tittley, J.; Mailloux, C.; Desgagnes, A.; Perreault, K.; Mercier, C.; Dionne, C. E.; Roy, J.-S.; Masse-Alarie, H.

2025-09-08 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.09.07.25335260
Show abstract

QuestionIs a heatwrap combined with exercise more effective in improving symptoms and functional outcomes on short- mid- and long-term than either a heatwrap alone or a sham heatwrap in acute low back pain? DesignA multi-arm randomised controlled trial. ParticipantsAdults aged 18 to 65 years with a new episode of low back pain (defined as pain for six weeks or less with no low back pain in the three months preceding the current episode). InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: heatwrap plus exercise (n=34), heatwrap alone (n=33) or sham heatwrap (n=32). All participants were asked to wear the heatwrap eight hours per day for seven days. The exercise group had to perform exercises 30 minutes per day for five days. All participants received evidence-based advice for the management of their pain. Outcome measuresOur primary outcome was pain-related disability at one week measured with the Oswestry Disability Index. Our secondary outcomes were pain intensity, pain-related fear of movement, self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing and perception of change. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 1, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. Data analysisWe used linear mixed models (LMMs) to compare intervention efficacy on all outcomes at all time-points with intention-to-treat analyses, testing the Group x Time interaction. ResultsThe analysis included 99 participants. The results for pain-related disability showed no Group x Time interaction (F=0.467; p=0.910), but a statistically significant time effect was observed (F=39.843; p<0.001) as scores decreased for all groups at one week, with an estimated mean difference of -7.8 (95% CI -9.7 to -5.9). All outcomes showed a time effect at all time-points. ConclusionA combination of heatwrap and exercise did not provide a superior effect on symptoms and functional outcomes on short-, mid and long-term when compared to a heatwrap alone and a sham heatwrap in adults with acute low back pain. Future guidelines should consider these results to formulate recommendations for acute LBP. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03986047

Matching journals

1
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
239× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 5%
4.4× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 35%
13.7%
4
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 0.8%
13× avg
5
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.4%
36× avg
6
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 19%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 6%
4.1× avg
8
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.6%
20× avg
9
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.7%
22× avg
11
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
7.7× avg
12
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
9.9× avg
13
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.7%
23× avg
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
9.9× avg
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%
16
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
8.7× avg
17
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 21 published papers
Top 1%
7.9× avg
19
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 4%
4.7× avg
20
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 16%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 85%
0.7%