Delays and disruptions in cervical cancer care services during the COVID 19 pandemic and their impact on survival outcomes. Real world data from India
Gade, V. K. V.; Sharma, J.; Maity, S.; Bhattacharyya, T.; GY, S.; Sah, D. K.; Chakraborty, S.; Rai, B.; Ghoshal, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to significant disruptions in cancer diagnosis and treatment in India. This retrospective study with two participating centres aimed to classify and quantify the delays and disruptions in cervical cancer care during the pandemic and evaluate their impact on treatment outcomes. MethodsRecords of newly diagnosed patients of cervical cancer registered in between March 2020 and December 2021 were evaluated. A delay group was identified if there was either a gap of more than 3 months from onset of symptoms to histological proof or a gap of more than 6 weeks from diagnosis to start of treatment or a gap of more than 4 consecutive days during Radiotherapy (RT). The cause for the delays and its impact on stage and treatment were identified. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan Meir method and differences in survival were analysed using the log rank test. ResultsOut of the 418 cervical cancer patients eligible for final analysis registered, 268 (64{middle dot}1%) were found to have a delay. While a diagnostic delay was noted in 220 (52{middle dot}6%) patients, a delay in start of treatment was seen in 126 (30{middle dot}1%) and treatment interruption was seen in 84 (20%) patients. Logistic delays were the most common cause (54%) followed by delays due to COVID 19 infection (7{middle dot}6%). The delay group had a higher proportion of patients with metastatic disease-Stage IVB (5{middle dot}9% vs 0{middle dot}6%) and a lower proportion of patients with early stage disease - Stage I-IIA (7{middle dot}4 % vs 9{middle dot}3%) compared to the group without delays(p=0{middle dot}02). Upward Stage migration was seen in 22% of patients in the Delay group and 11{middle dot}3% of patients in the No Delay group (p=0{middle dot}004). Definitive Radiotherapy (RT) followed by Brachytherapy was the most common treatment modality (63{middle dot}8% of cohort). The proportion of patients receiving external supplementary boost (12{middle dot}6% vs 9{middle dot}3%) and Palliative RT (4% vs 0{middle dot}6%) was higher in the Delay group as compared to the No Delay group (p=<0{middle dot}001). After a median follow up of 37 months, The 1 year, 2 year and 3 year Overall Survival (OS) was 75%, 58% and 52% in the Delay group and 92%, 87% and 84% in the group without delays respectively (p<0{middle dot}001).The 1 year, 2 year and 3 year PFS was 65%, 54% and 46% in the Delay group and 91%, 86% and 79% in the group without delays respectively (p<0{middle dot}001). ConclusionDelays and disruptions in cervical cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic led to tumour upstaging and worsened survival outcomes. This highlights the urgent need for developing strategies aimed at optimal resource utilisation and minimizing delays in the event of a future pandemic. Research in ContextO_ST_ABSWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICC_ST_ABSThe COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted cancer care, worsening delays in diagnosis and treatment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like India. Cervical cancer patients faced increased risks due to interruptions in radiotherapy and diagnostic delays. It is well documented that prolongation of overall treatment time can adversely affect treatment outcomes in patients with cervical cancer . WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSTo our knowledge, this retrospective cohort study from two institutions is the first study that reports the real-world impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on cervical cancer survival outcomes in India. In this study we describe and stratify the various kinds of delay - namely diagnostic delay, delay in initiation of treatment and delay during treatment. We demonstrate increased incidence of upward stage migration in patients with delays. The overall survival and progression free survival was significantly worse in the group with delays as compared to the group without delays. We also show that most of the delays are attributable to logistic reasons rather than COVID 19 infection. Delays caused by COVID 19 did not significantly influence survival outcomes. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE, OR POLICYThe findings of this study seem to suggest that COVID 19 based nationwide lockdowns, inadvertently led to significant disruptions in cervical cancer care, resulting in poorer patient outcomes. This study highlights the urgent need for developing strategies aimed at optimal resource utilisation and minimizing delays in the event of a future pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 94%
- Circulating tumor fraction analyses with ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing predict response to chemoradiation and recurrence in stage IV small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a longitudinal case study 92%
- mTOR inhibitors as radiosensitizers in neuroendocrine neoplasms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 94%
- Updated Results of 3,050 Non-melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions in 1725 Patients Treated with High Resolution Dermal Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Radiotherapy, A Multi-institutional Study 93%
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes following proton therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review 94%
- Standardising Breast Radiotherapy Structure Naming Conventions: A Machine Learning Approach 92%
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical candidacy and treatment uptake among women with cervical cancer at public referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda 93%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 92%
- Moving forward through consensus: a national Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in prostate cancer in Uganda 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in cancer patients on systemic antineoplastic treatment in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal 92%
- Retrospective study on the clinicogenomic characteristics of EGFR mutant and wildtype NSCLC 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.