Back

Impact of WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Handbook training on antibiotics prescribing knowledge among primary care providers: A vignette-based, pre-post pilot study in Patna, India

Thapa, P.; Shukla, P.; Joshi, C.; Sayood, S.; Sinha, P. K.; Timilsina, D.; Dutta, M.; Pai, M.; Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, S.; Gandra, S.

2025-09-10 public and global health
10.1101/2025.09.06.25335195 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionInappropriate antibiotic prescribing is a major concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly at the primary care level. The WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Handbook was introduced to promote rational antibiotic use, yet its real-world feasibility and potential impact remain underexplored. Our study evaluated the effectiveness and usefulness of the WHO AWaRe Handbook training among primary care providers (PCPs) in Patna, India. MethodsWe conducted a pre-post interventional study among 145 PCPs (40 formal providers (FPs) and 105 informal providers (IPs), 98% male) in Patna, India. Participants received training from an infectious disease physician on the WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Handbook. Antibiotic prescribing knowledge was assessed before and after the intervention using clinical vignettes for four conditions: acute diarrhea, urinary tract infection (UTI), cellulitis, and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). An endline survey evaluated the perceived usefulness of the training. Changes in prescribing were analyzed using McNemars test for paired data. ResultsThe intervention significantly reduced overall antibiotic prescribing for acute diarrhea (p=0.0003) and UTI (p=0.0113), with greater reductions among IPs. No significant changes were observed for cellulitis (p=0.3692) or CAP (p=0.7150). Watch-category antibiotic prescribing significantly decreased for acute diarrhea (p<0.0001), with no significant changes for other conditions. IPs showed greater improvements overall compared to FPs. The majority of providers (75%; n=107) rated the training as moderately or very useful. ConclusionTraining PCPs using the WHO AWaRe Handbook improved antibiotic prescribing knowledge for some common conditions, particularly among IPs. Future research should focus on the impact of ongoing training, tailored interventions, and long-term follow-up. Strengths and limitations of this study- This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of WHO AWaRe Handbook training on improving antibiotic prescribing knowledge among primary care providers in India, focusing on both formal and informal healthcare providers. - Using a vignette-based, pre-post study design allowed for standardized assessment of prescribing knowledge across four common clinical conditions: acute diarrhea, cellulitis, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. - Stratified analysis by provider type offered important insights into the interventions differential effects, particularly highlighting knowledge improvements among informal providers. - While the study captures shifts in prescribing knowledge, it does not assess actual prescribing behavior in clinical practice, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. - The study evaluated outcomes over a short follow-up period, which restricts understanding of the sustainability of training effects over time.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.