Impact of WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Handbook training on antibiotics prescribing knowledge among primary care providers: A vignette-based, pre-post pilot study in Patna, India
Thapa, P.; Shukla, P.; Joshi, C.; Sayood, S.; Sinha, P. K.; Timilsina, D.; Dutta, M.; Pai, M.; Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, S.; Gandra, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionInappropriate antibiotic prescribing is a major concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly at the primary care level. The WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Handbook was introduced to promote rational antibiotic use, yet its real-world feasibility and potential impact remain underexplored. Our study evaluated the effectiveness and usefulness of the WHO AWaRe Handbook training among primary care providers (PCPs) in Patna, India. MethodsWe conducted a pre-post interventional study among 145 PCPs (40 formal providers (FPs) and 105 informal providers (IPs), 98% male) in Patna, India. Participants received training from an infectious disease physician on the WHO AWaRe Antibiotic Handbook. Antibiotic prescribing knowledge was assessed before and after the intervention using clinical vignettes for four conditions: acute diarrhea, urinary tract infection (UTI), cellulitis, and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). An endline survey evaluated the perceived usefulness of the training. Changes in prescribing were analyzed using McNemars test for paired data. ResultsThe intervention significantly reduced overall antibiotic prescribing for acute diarrhea (p=0.0003) and UTI (p=0.0113), with greater reductions among IPs. No significant changes were observed for cellulitis (p=0.3692) or CAP (p=0.7150). Watch-category antibiotic prescribing significantly decreased for acute diarrhea (p<0.0001), with no significant changes for other conditions. IPs showed greater improvements overall compared to FPs. The majority of providers (75%; n=107) rated the training as moderately or very useful. ConclusionTraining PCPs using the WHO AWaRe Handbook improved antibiotic prescribing knowledge for some common conditions, particularly among IPs. Future research should focus on the impact of ongoing training, tailored interventions, and long-term follow-up. Strengths and limitations of this study- This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of WHO AWaRe Handbook training on improving antibiotic prescribing knowledge among primary care providers in India, focusing on both formal and informal healthcare providers. - Using a vignette-based, pre-post study design allowed for standardized assessment of prescribing knowledge across four common clinical conditions: acute diarrhea, cellulitis, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. - Stratified analysis by provider type offered important insights into the interventions differential effects, particularly highlighting knowledge improvements among informal providers. - While the study captures shifts in prescribing knowledge, it does not assess actual prescribing behavior in clinical practice, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. - The study evaluated outcomes over a short follow-up period, which restricts understanding of the sustainability of training effects over time.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Drivers of inappropriate use of antimicrobials in South Asia: A systematic review of qualitative literature 95%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 95%
- Behavior-change interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in human health, animal health, and livestock agriculture: A systematic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 97%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 95%
- Gender Differences In Antibiotics Use Behaviour And Access To Antibiotics In Low- And Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Compliance to 4Ds of antimicrobial stewardship practices in a tertiary care centre 95%
- The appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy in the management of symptomatic urinary tract infection patients-A cross sectional study in Nairobi County, Kenya 94%
- Better Antimicrobial Resistance Data Analysis & Reporting in Less Time 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 95%
- Clinical pattern of antibiotic overuse and misuse in primary healthcare hospitals in the southwest of China 94%
- Prevalence of Bacterial Coinfection and Patterns of Antibiotics Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.