Back

Psychometric properties of Persian-version PTSD questionnaire Applied through Phone Follow-Ups: An experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort

Shahedifar, N.; Razzaghi, A.; Asghari-Jafarabadi, M.; Farahbakhsh, M.; Bazargan-Hejazi, S.; Golestani, M.; Abedi Gheshlaghi, L.; Sadeghi-Bazargani, H.

2025-09-09 public and global health
10.1101/2025.09.06.25334907 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsTraumatic events of road traffic accidents (RTAs) lead mostly to post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD). We aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the PTSD-5 checklist at consecutive phone follow-ups and its applicability in screening for PTSD in RTA survivors. Subject and MethodsThe study assessed the reliability and applicability of PTSD-5 tool through phone surveys, within a national traffic cohort platform. We recruited 150 patients at one-, six-, and twelve-month follow-ups after discharge, enrolling 50 patients per phase. We measured reliability and the agreement using Kappa coefficients, percentages of agreement and Bland-Altman method. Data were analysed using STATA statistical software package version 15. ResultsThe participants were mostly male (79.8%), with a mean age (SD) of 41 (14.7). More than 70% of participants were married or employed or educated. It had excellent internal consistency reliability at total and follow-up levels (Cronbachs = 0.95) and good total stability reliability (ICC=0.77,95%CI:0.68, 0.83). One month follow-up data showed poor stability reliability (ICC=0.32,95%CI:-0.10, 0.59). The agreement between test and retest data at six- and 12-month follow-ups was excellent. Total Kappa coefficient and the percentage of agreement were 0.58 and 71.3%, respectively. The Bland Altman plot on one-year follow-up data revealed more agreement at healthier state (lower scores). ConclusionThe Persian PTSD checklist was highly reliable and applicable through phone interviews post discharge in road traffic injury adult patients. It was suitable to apply within the national cohort study and would decline the data collection costs.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.