Back

Brain structure-function coupling - relationship with language lateralisation

Andrulyte, I.; Zago, L.; Jobard, G.; Lemaitre, H.; Taylor, P. N.; Rheault, F.; Joliot, M.; Petit, L.; Keller, S.

2025-09-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.05.674563 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Language is one of the most extensively studied lateralised cognitive functions in the human brain, predominantly relying on the left hemisphere in most individuals. However, the mechanisms by which a stable white matter architecture underpins individual language functions remain unclear. Previous studies have employed structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) coupling for individual fingerprinting and task decoding, suggesting that variability in brain entropy may serve as a distinguishing characteristic for language lateralisation. We examined a large cohort of healthy adults (n = 285) to investigate SC-FC coupling and identify markers distinguishing different language laterality groups. Functional connectivity was measured using resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) time-series data, while structural connectivity was determined via probabilistic fibre tractography. SC-FC coupling was investigated using the SENSAAS language atlas and defined as the Pearson correlation between non-zero elements of regional structural and functional connectivity profiles. Group differences were assessed using the PALM toolbox in FSL. Our findings revealed that increased SC-FC coupling in the left precentral sulcus was associated with typical language lateralisation, while increased coupling in the right middle temporal gyrus and left anterior insula was observed in individuals with atypical language lateralisation (pFDR < 0.05). Non-lateralised individuals exhibited increased coupling in the left anterior insula compared to lateralised (pFDR<0.05). SC-FC coupling offers a promising framework to uncover functional and anatomical differences among individuals with varying language lateralisation. This regional specificity indicates that typical, atypical, and non-lateralised profiles rely on different structural-functional alignments, likely reflecting the recruitment of alternative pathways for language processing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.5%
3
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
5
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
8
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
9
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
18
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
21
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%