Neural Subspaces Encode Sequential Working Memory, but Neural Sequences Do Not
Santo-Angles, A.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Chu, W. K. H.; Lindsay, G. W.; Sreenivasan, K. K.
Show abstract
The neural mechanisms of multiple-item working memory are not well understood. In the current study, we address two competing hypotheses about the neural basis of sequential working memory: neural subspaces versus neural sequences. Using broadband MEG data from human participants, we applied dimensionality reduction and multivariate decoding techniques to test whether sequential items are maintained during the retention period through the reactivation of individual items in sequence (neural sequences), or by organizing them into distinct low-dimensional subspaces (neural subspaces). Our results revealed behaviorally relevant, low-dimensional neural subspaces that organized memory representations during the retention period but not during stimulus encoding, supporting the neural subspaces hypothesis. In contrast, we found no evidence of sequential neural replay during the delay period, contrary to predictions from the neural sequences hypothesis. Together, our findings suggest that sequential working memory is maintained through structured geometric organization in low-dimensional representational space, rather than through the sequential reactivation of individual items.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel verbal instructions recruit abstract neural patterns of time-variable information dimensionality 97%
- Dimensionality and ramping: Signatures of sentence integration in the dynamics of brains and deep language models 97%
- Automatic and fast encoding of representational uncertainty underlies probability distortion 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency-specific neural signatures of perceptual content and perceptual stability 98%
- Non-feature-specific elevated responses and feature-specific backward replay in human brain induced by visual sequence exposure 98%
- Stimulus representation in human frontal cortex supports flexible control in working memory 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Representational similarity learning reveals a graded multi-dimensional semantic space in the human anterior temporal cortex 97%
- Oscillatory Multi-Timescale Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Sequence Prediction 97%
- No evidence that visual impulses enhance the readout of retrieved long-term memory contents from EEG activity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A characterization of the neural representation of confidence during probabilistic learning 97%
- Impulse perturbation reveals cross-modal access to sensory working memory through learned associations 96%
- Leveraging shared connectivity to aggregate heterogeneous datasets into a common response space 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.