Variability in First Academic Medicine Job Offers in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
Olson, E. M.; Modes, M. E.; Rowe, T. J.; Lyons, P. G.; Ingraham, N. E.; Nadig, N. R.; Schroedl, C. J.; Gao, C. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundA minority of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) graduates pursue careers in academic medicine. Although compensation is only a portion of the career decision, job negotiations remain shrouded in ambiguity and inconsistency. Additionally, while role-level salary tables exist through the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), to our knowledge there is no resource that includes important non-salary information such as start-up packages, full-time equivalent (FTE) breakdown, and bonus ranges. ObjectiveWe sought to describe key components of first PCCM academic job offers for both physician scientists and clinician educators, including salary, start-up packages, non-clinical FTE, and bonuses. MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed via a snowball method between May - June 2025. PCCM graduates between 2020-2025 who accepted a job in academic medicine were included. Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon tests were used for ordinal comparisons. Qualitative analysis of free text responses was performed with a social cognitive career theory framework. ResultsThere were 60 respondents who provided information about 103 job offers, with 50% (14/28) of physician-scientists and 66% (21/32) of clinician-educators reporting more than one job offer. Physician-scientists received lower salary offers compared to clinician-educators (respective median ranges: $150,000-$199,999 vs $250,000-$299,999, p<0.001). 35.7% physician-scientists (10/28) received a career development award prior to negotiation, which was associated with a higher start-up package offer (p<0.05). For all clinician-educator jobs (n=59), 42.4% had non-clinical FTE in the initial offer. Many respondents commented on the lack of negotiating power. ConclusionPCCM physician-scientists and clinician-educators experience wide variability in their initial job offers. Recognizing differences is essential to improve transparency in job negotiations in academic medicine.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 97%
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 96%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 94%
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 94%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 93%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 92%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 93%
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 92%
- COVID-19 Advanced Respiratory Care Educational Training Program for Healthcare Workers in Lesotho: An Observational Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual Recruitment is Here to Stay: 2020 ID Fellowship Program and Matched Applicant Recruitment Experiences 95%
- High proportion of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals 1-6 months after illness and association with disease severity in an outpatient telemedicine population 89%
- HIV Treatment Outcomes In Rural Georgia Using Telemedicine 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.