Cross-platform digital PCR evaluation of bovine papilloma virus quantification: introducing PCR-ValiPal for Standardized guided assay validation
Gleerup, D.; Vynck, M.; Gysens, L.; De Baere, C.; Vandesompele, J.; Thas, O.; Martens, A.; Haspeslagh, M.; De Spiegelaere, W.
Show abstract
Digital Polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) enables precise and absolute quantification of nucleic acids by partitioning samples into thousands of individual PCR micro-reactions. While it minimizes the need for standard curves and enhances reproducibility compared to qPCR, thorough assay validation remains crucial. We introduce PCR-ValiPal, a user-friendly web application that standardizes dPCR assay validation steps and streamlines calculations of limit of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision, trueness, and linearity in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20395:2019. To demonstrate PCR-ValiPals capabilities and the value of method-specific optimization, we use it to validate a novel three-color PCR assay for Bovine Papillomavirus (BPV) types 1 and 2, comparing four platforms: Naica (droplet dPCR), QIAcuity (microwell dPCR), LOAA (real-time dPCR), and CFX96 (qPCR). Using synthetic standards, we assess the platforms performance under identical assay conditions. Naica and QIAcuity showed lower LOB and LOQ values, along with minimal bias for BPV-1, while LOAA demonstrated stable but negative bias. Although qPCR exhibited the highest sensitivity for BPV-2, it was less sensitive at low concentrations for BPV-1. These results underscore the value of method-specific optimization and the usefulness of PCR-ValiPal.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Novel Molecular Assay to the Diagnostic of COVID-19 Based on Real Time PCR with High Resolution Melting 94%
- Versatile and flexible microfluidic qPCR test for high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 and cellular response detection in nasopharyngeal swab samples 94%
- Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 96%
- Performance evaluation of the BD SARS-CoV-2 reagents for the BD MAX™ system 94%
- Comparative Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays using Seven Different Primer/Probe Sets and One Assay Kit 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Reagent and Virus Benchmarking Panel for a Uniform Analytical Performance Assessment of N Antigen–Based Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 95%
- Multiplex Target-Redundant RT-LAMP for Robust Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Fluorescent Universal Displacement Probes 95%
- Comparison of LIAISON QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into account 94%
- A broad-based probe-free qPCR assay for detection and discrimination of three human herpes viruses 94%
- Development and Validation of Novel Cell-free Direct Neutralization Assay for SARS-CoV-2 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.