Wireless Sensor Network: New Concept of Spatial-Temporal Monitoring Plant-Environment Interactions
Ifrach, I.; Shenhar, I.; Averbuch, N.; Hurwitz, A.; Moshelion, M.
Show abstract
We present a low-cost, standards-based wireless sensor network (WSN) for continuous, canopy-integrated monitoring of plant-environment interactions. Each plant carries in-canopy microclimate sensors (temperature, relative humidity, illuminance) paired with nearby ambient references, yielding real-time canopy-ambient differentials. The system is easy to install: at planting or sowing, sensors are fixed at positions that will lie within the developing canopy, and a separate ambient reference area is designated and kept free of vegetation. As plants grow, they envelop the sensors, thereby capturing growth dynamics over time. The sensors accuracy was validated against a commercial weather station and portable system that measures gas exchange, temperature and light (LI-COR 6800/6400), and the systems ability to resolve plant physiological activity was confirmed using the PlantArray functional phenotyping platform with independent whole-plant transpiration and biomass references. Under controlled growth-room conditions and across two contrasting Cannabis cultivars, daily transpiration strongly predicted biomass gain (R{superscript 2} > 0.9). Microclimate signals mirrored physiology: midday canopy air was cooler by 4-7 {degrees}C, more humid by 18-25 % RH, and increasingly shaded as biomass accumulated, with temperature, RH, and light attenuation showing saturating logarithmic relationships with growth. The network operated for months unattended with low packet loss and predictable power use. It provides 4D (x-y-z-time) coverage, where x and y denote horizontal location, z the vertical position within the canopy, and time the dynamics, enabling resolution of where changes occur and how they evolve, and supplying high-frequency labeled data. This system complements, rather than replaces, precision instruments and high-end phenotyping platforms, providing a scalable layer for continuous tracking across wide areas. We outline practical constraints and next steps toward field pilots, modest energy harvesting, expanded sensor suites, and integration with machine learning for predictive crop management.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DIRT/μ - Automated extraction of root hair traits using combinatorial optimization 93%
- Root anatomical gradients and cultivar differences underlie variation in root hydraulic properties in German winter wheat 92%
- Cortical parenchyma wall width (CPW) regulates root metabolic cost and maize performance under suboptimal water availability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering natural variation in root system architecture and growth dynamics using a robotics-assisted phenomics platform 94%
- Increased signal to noise ratios within experimental field trials by regressing spatially distributed soil properties as principal components. 92%
- Determining the scale at which variation in WUE traits changes population yields 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- panomiX: Investigating Mechanisms Of Trait Emergence Through Multi-Omics Data Integration 92%
- Fast and efficient root phenotyping via pose estimation 92%
- From neglecting to including cultivar-specific per se temperature responses: Extending the concept of thermal time for plant development modeling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- OPEN leaf: an open-source cloud-based phenotyping system for tracking dynamic changes at leaf-specific resolution in Arabidopsis 94%
- Root Walker: an automated pipeline for large scale quantification of early root growth responses at high spatial and temporal resolution 92%
- From aerial drone to QTL: Leveraging next-generation phenotyping to reveal the genetics of color and height in field-grown Lactuca sativa 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.