A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Intracisternal Engineered Autologous Exosomes (NV-101) to Restore Neuronal Proteostasis in Early Alzheimer's Disease: The RESTORE Protocol
Iqbal, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe current therapeutic landscape for Alzheimers disease (AD) offers limited efficacy. The failure of the neuronal proteostasis network a system critical for preventing toxic protein aggregation is a fundamental pathological process in AD. Molecular chaperones, which are deficient in the AD brain, represent a compelling therapeutic target. A major obstacle has been delivering large biologics like chaperones across the blood-brain barrier. Engineered exosomes offer a promising platform for neuron-specific delivery of nucleic acid cargo. ObjectiveThe primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single intracisternal dose of NV-101, an autologous dendritic cell-derived exosome engineered with neuron-targeting peptides and DNAJB6 mRNA, compared to placebo in participants with early AD. Secondary objectives are to assess its biological activity through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. MethodsThe RESTORE trial is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. Eighteen participants with biomarker-confirmed early AD will be enrolled across three sequential dose cohorts (Low, Medium, High). Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either NV-101 or placebo (excipient buffer) via a single intracisternal magna injection. The primary outcome is the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events over 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes include change from baseline in CSF levels of DNAJB6 protein, oligomeric amyloid-{beta}42, and phosphorylated tau (p-tau181). Exploratory outcomes include neuroimaging and cognitive measures. ConclusionsThis first-in-human study will generate critical safety and initial proof-of-mechanism data for a novel therapeutic strategy aimed at correcting proteostatic failure in AD.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The New Therapeutics in Alzheimer’s Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol 93%
- Returning Research Results That Indicate Risk of Alzheimer Disease Dementia to Healthy Participants in Longitudinal Studies (WeSHARE) 93%
- Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis strain plasma (LC-Plasma) in easing symptoms in patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): protocol for an exploratory, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (PLATEAU study) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a seamless phase 2A-phase 2B randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of benfotiamine in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease (BenfoTeam) 97%
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 93%
- Quantitative 3D histochemistry reveals region-specific amyloid-β reduction by the antidiabetic drug netoglitazone 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparative study of the effects of Aducanumab and scanning ultrasound on amyloid plaques and behavior in the APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer disease 92%
- Comparison of plasma soluble and extracellular vesicles-associated biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease patients and cognitively normal individuals 91%
- Machine learning applications in vascular neuroimaging for the diagnosis and prognosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.