Back

Normative Executive Function Development Reveals Age-Varying Mental Health Associations in Youth

Li, Y.; Tan, L.; Duan, Y.; Xu, X.; Xu, H.; Jia, L.; Yu, M.; Li, Z.; Zhao, C.; Chen, Q.; Larsen, B.; Pines, A.; Wang, T.; Chen, R.; Cui, Z.

2025-09-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.09.04.25335085 medRxiv
Show abstract

IMPORTANCEExecutive function (EF) is crucial for adolescent development and mental health. However, population-level benchmarks of EF growth and their relevance to psychiatric symptoms remain unclear, especially for non-Western populations. OBJECTIVETo establish normative developmental charts of EF across adolescence and examine how deviations from these norms relate to mental health symptoms in an age-specific manner. DESIGNPrimary data were drawn from the baseline data of the ongoing Adolescent Health Enhancing Long-term Plan (A-HELP) study (2022-2027), with replication from three waves of longitudinal data (2016-2022) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. SETTINGPopulation-based studies conducted in China (A-HELP). PARTICIPANTSThe A-HELP sample included 33,622 Chinese adolescents (11.00-18.00 years; 16,558 males) who completed EF tasks and mental health assessments. Normative developmental charts were constructed using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape, from which individual EF deviation scores were derived. Associations with mental health were examined using generalized additive models, including age-varying interaction analyses. Replication were performed in 11,549 U.S. adolescents (8.92-15.75 years; 6,010 males) from the ABCD study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThree EF tasks were assessed: Go/No-Go (inhibitory control), 1-back and 2-back (working memory). Mental health symptoms were measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, including emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and prosocial behavior. RESULTSAdolescents completed Go/No-Go (N=17,021), 1-back (N=15,945), and 2-back (N=10,167) tasks. All tasks showed significant age-related improvement and decreasing inter-individual variability. Higher EF deviation scores, which reflect better performance, were associated with fewer peer and conduct problems, lower hyperactivity/inattention, and greater prosocial behavior. Age-resolved analyses revealed that these associations varied across development, with stronger effect sizes observed in early adolescence that declined by late adolescence. Findings were replicated in 22,831 Flanker task observations from the ABCD study, showing consistent developmental patterns and EF-mental health associations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThis study establishes normative developmental charts of EF in adolescence and highlights that deviations from these norms are linked to psychiatric symptoms, especially in early adolescence. These findings provide a developmental framework for identifying youth at risk of mental health difficulties, offering culturally generalizable benchmarks for early screening and intervention.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.